Today, I swam the 200 yards free in 2:09.11.
This beats my previous best of 2:09.54 from April 1994.
I challenged the 2:09.54 in the past 11 years, over 20 times, many times under what I learned the hard way to be the wrong preparation, and never came close.
My result will be posted officially in the USMS databse.
I won't be able to make the 2005 Short Course Nationals, but hopefully I will make the 2005 Long Course Nationals.
The reason that I bring this success here is that there are some lessons to learn from it:
1.) to pursue virtue and excellence by meeting the intrinsic requirements that come to having a worthwhile goal (in my case, the goal is to stay in my prime intellectually and physically, for longtime), that's intelligence and tenacious work;
I immigrated to U.S. and relocated within U.S. on job skills in science to live my lifestyle;
this lifestyle comprises now, over 39 weeks of the 2004-2005 season so far, of 1,093 kilometers of training (an average of 28.025 kilometers per week, or 30,828 yards per week, no matter the holidays, tapering or illness, that includes kicking, strokes, and technique quotas), the most mileage I slowly built my late starter physiology up to in life, mostly under a Masters club with primarly college and age group swimming expertise, which I searched for and choosed;
I also cross train consistently in weights and running;
2.) I scrutinize self-indulgence and greed (to an employer who was asking me to work overtime like his Japanese employees do, even though I was ahead in schedule in a project, and who thought that I am a slave to him giving me a work visa, I stated "You know, my life doesn't depend on you." and I walked away from a near six-figures salary because it was jeopardizing my swim training; I looked for and found another) and I scrutinize good intentions backed up by feelings without hard data.
2:09.11 and staying in my prime, that's a tribute to 1.) and 2.).
Parents
Former Member
That's excellent. I swam in college but since joining USMS two years ago have been unable to break 2:07. Of course I was never a sprinter and overcame a lack of talent with lots of yardage. Interestingly, in the 500 the gap between me and the fastest in my age group remains about the same as it was 25 years ago. In his book The Naturalist Prof. E.O.Wilson describes how he, as an adult, decided to train seriously in running. Despite his training, he found that the gap between him and the fastest runners in his age group remained the same as it had been when he was younger. He attributed this to genetics. Ion's (and Dima's) success as a late starter in the sport is likely due to a combination of genetics and a lot of training. Unfortunately, I can't change my genes.
That's excellent. I swam in college but since joining USMS two years ago have been unable to break 2:07. Of course I was never a sprinter and overcame a lack of talent with lots of yardage. Interestingly, in the 500 the gap between me and the fastest in my age group remains about the same as it was 25 years ago. In his book The Naturalist Prof. E.O.Wilson describes how he, as an adult, decided to train seriously in running. Despite his training, he found that the gap between him and the fastest runners in his age group remained the same as it had been when he was younger. He attributed this to genetics. Ion's (and Dima's) success as a late starter in the sport is likely due to a combination of genetics and a lot of training. Unfortunately, I can't change my genes.
