In the first issue of USMS Swimmer magazine I actually liked the Freestyle Open Turns article. I have perfected my own freestyle turn where I can beat most flip turn people. Note I said most. Having a great flip turn is an awesome advantage to fast freestylers. But that leaves me out.
A good open turn allows me to get a good breathe, VERY important for someone with asthma. It also allows me to get in a perfect streamline and push off about 7 to 8 yards before the first stroke. I also have a bad wing, so taking less strokes per lap means I can sleep at night.
But now to be critical, looking at pages 18 and 19 there are several minor flaws in this "Competitive Butterfly Turn". My concern is that both new and older swimmers will think this is the "perfect" butterfly turn, and it is not.
Let me state that I feel the fastest competitive butterfly and breaststroke turn is actually done where you change from being on your front to immediately going on your back!:confused:
Let me explain, the rules simply say that on butterfly and breaststroke turns you must be "101.2.4—Turns
The shoulders must be at or past the vertical toward the *** when the swimmer leaves the wall ".
Note key works, Shoulders, vertical and wall. It does not say you must have the entire body facing downwards, as new swimmers often think.
Going on to the magazine article, pages 18 and 19, I agree on the feet position shown in 2 B.
Ever see a new swimmer try the butterfly or *** turn, and they stay completely on the waters surface and throw their entire body sideways until they can push off again on their stomachs? SLOW! It takes time to move your body to the side, even more time to move the body to the same "***" position.
The swimmer in 2 C and 2 D clearly show the swimmer has taken the time to turn the body 90 degrees to the waters surface. This means he has to twist his body just one more degree "past the vertical towards the ***" to satisfy the rules.
What would have been about two tenths faster would have been to turn from "on the ***" in butterfly and breaststroke to immediately throw the head back and pull the legs up, effectively turning onto your back. This is just faster than turing onto your side first.
Now that you have gone from butterfly to on your back, just like in figure 2D the bottom arm both pulls your body underwater and allows the upper body to twist. All you have to do is twist your shoulders that 90 degrees to satisfy the rule book. Your body momentum will continue the twisting until you are completely on the ***.
Most coaches prefer the feet to point not at 90 degrees as in 2D, but to be pointed at an angle between 20 and 45 degrees from vertical, nearly pointing to the waters surface!
Note that you must have gone past vertical before the feet leaves to wall. There was a great woman swimmer who lost a Gold medal from the Olympics, she was disqualified in trials because she did not bother to go past vertical until after her feet passed the "T" on the bottom of the pool.
With practice this "Stanford" turn is between 2 and 5 tenths of a second faster than standard turns. The reason I call it the Stanford turn is former World Record holder John Moffett taught it to me in the 80s, and at that time not a lot of other schools used this style. Look at swimmers from the Olympics and NCAA's and you will see this turn 90 % of the time in butterfly and breaststroke.
Now to my last observation. Figure 2E shows the swimmer in what I call the old style Superman streamline, with the head looking slightly forwards. This style has the biceps next to the ears and the hands either next to each other or placed on top of each other.
The modern streamline can gain one to two YARDS more distance for ZERO extra effort. It starts with the swimmers head ALWAYS looking at the bottom of the pool. The biceps are behind the head as the shoulders are squeezed together. This allows the body with as measured at the shoulders to decrease several inches.
The KEY to this streamline is to lock the top hands thumb over the bottom hands little fingure, and push this locked hands forwards.
This makes the body longer in length and smaller in diameter.
For those of you who taped the Olympics or will be taping the NCAAs, you will see this streamline in most of the better swimmers.
More information on turns and streamlines can be found at www.breaststroke.info.
Coach Wayne McCauley
ASCA Level 5 Masters
Parents
Former Member
How fast a person can turn is greatly affected by body height. Not only can a 5 footer turn in a tighter ball, the feet and legs do not weigh as much. So someone like Kitajima can turn faster than a much taller breaststroker, given the same technique. Phelps is still learning, I am sure his technique will continue to change in the next 4 years.
What I try to describe is what should be the best technique, not what every one can attain. But I have never heard a masters swimmer who did not want to at least know what would be best.
It is amazing to look at past Olympic Champions and you can often see horrendous bad turns, bad starts, and you wonder how they won. As recently as 1980 there were still people belly flopping. Have you seen the video of the two English Olympic breaststroke champions? One had bad start, the other bad turns. But because they won, should we copy them?
Bill feels it is OK to see simularities between Phelps and the swimmer shown. I used to get the same stuff from Swim magazine. The problem will always be, people assume that what they are getting is the best, most perfect technique. Is it better than what they are doing now, Yes probably.
Yet I guarranty you there are masters swimmers who are half a second faster 5 meters to the wall and out, using better technique. And I have seen masters swimmers with better technique than some Olympians! I have seen teammates blow other swimmers out of the water with better technique. One of our women did 24.9 for 50 back, not in great shape! We used to have a woman who could go below 23 in a 50 free any time she felt like beating the men!
Technique, and practicing perfect are the keys.
Which would you prefer, loosing a half a second or being ahead?
Same goes for the starts, combine all the parts of a start, dive underwater and first stroke and there can be a full second difference even at the Olympic level.
Again, which do you prefer?
Instead of showing Phelps feet, you should show his streamline where he takes 7 to 9 Kicks underwater to go the full 15 meters allowed in LESS time than others for the same distance. His genetics will never allow him to have a perfect turn as fast as some one much smaller. But his genetics does allow him to have a longer boat streamline and go faster underwater!
When you read my articles I never discuss ordinary, I strive for perfection. There are 593 tenths of a second in the 100 meters breaststroke world record. Yet when Hansen pushed off the wall, his hands (one over the other), were angled down and not straight. That cost him at least 2 tenths of a second in the hundred and 6 tenths in the 200.
If you don't practice for perfection, someone else will:p
How fast a person can turn is greatly affected by body height. Not only can a 5 footer turn in a tighter ball, the feet and legs do not weigh as much. So someone like Kitajima can turn faster than a much taller breaststroker, given the same technique. Phelps is still learning, I am sure his technique will continue to change in the next 4 years.
What I try to describe is what should be the best technique, not what every one can attain. But I have never heard a masters swimmer who did not want to at least know what would be best.
It is amazing to look at past Olympic Champions and you can often see horrendous bad turns, bad starts, and you wonder how they won. As recently as 1980 there were still people belly flopping. Have you seen the video of the two English Olympic breaststroke champions? One had bad start, the other bad turns. But because they won, should we copy them?
Bill feels it is OK to see simularities between Phelps and the swimmer shown. I used to get the same stuff from Swim magazine. The problem will always be, people assume that what they are getting is the best, most perfect technique. Is it better than what they are doing now, Yes probably.
Yet I guarranty you there are masters swimmers who are half a second faster 5 meters to the wall and out, using better technique. And I have seen masters swimmers with better technique than some Olympians! I have seen teammates blow other swimmers out of the water with better technique. One of our women did 24.9 for 50 back, not in great shape! We used to have a woman who could go below 23 in a 50 free any time she felt like beating the men!
Technique, and practicing perfect are the keys.
Which would you prefer, loosing a half a second or being ahead?
Same goes for the starts, combine all the parts of a start, dive underwater and first stroke and there can be a full second difference even at the Olympic level.
Again, which do you prefer?
Instead of showing Phelps feet, you should show his streamline where he takes 7 to 9 Kicks underwater to go the full 15 meters allowed in LESS time than others for the same distance. His genetics will never allow him to have a perfect turn as fast as some one much smaller. But his genetics does allow him to have a longer boat streamline and go faster underwater!
When you read my articles I never discuss ordinary, I strive for perfection. There are 593 tenths of a second in the 100 meters breaststroke world record. Yet when Hansen pushed off the wall, his hands (one over the other), were angled down and not straight. That cost him at least 2 tenths of a second in the hundred and 6 tenths in the 200.
If you don't practice for perfection, someone else will:p
