Craig, perhaps you should read what I actually posted:
Originally posted by gull80
I'm only saying that I would like a publication that caters to those who do (which might still be of interest to those who don't).
I definitely did not say that such a publication should not include articles about sports medicine, injury prevention, rehab, cross training, dry land work, etc. That's the point--the content could be quite broad. And while I certainly did read the English Channel piece, I don't see how my opinion of one article, good, bad or indifferent, has much relevance to this discussion.
Craig, perhaps you should read what I actually posted:
Originally posted by gull80
I'm only saying that I would like a publication that caters to those who do (which might still be of interest to those who don't).
I definitely did not say that such a publication should not include articles about sports medicine, injury prevention, rehab, cross training, dry land work, etc. That's the point--the content could be quite broad. And while I certainly did read the English Channel piece, I don't see how my opinion of one article, good, bad or indifferent, has much relevance to this discussion.
