I still don't see how a single team with large pool resources in a high population area, is at a disadvantage compared to a group of teams, each with limited resources and few people to draw from.
I don't like superteam versus (single) club team divisions. That would put a Montana superclub (does such a thing exist?) in the same grouping as New England Masters. It would also put a local team I know of (which is not part of Illinois Masters), which fields 3 family members, up against WCM. I think this is the wrong way to slice up the team problem (if you think there is a problem).
I still don't see how a single team with large pool resources in a high population area, is at a disadvantage compared to a group of teams, each with limited resources and few people to draw from.
I don't like superteam versus (single) club team divisions. That would put a Montana superclub (does such a thing exist?) in the same grouping as New England Masters. It would also put a local team I know of (which is not part of Illinois Masters), which fields 3 family members, up against WCM. I think this is the wrong way to slice up the team problem (if you think there is a problem).