Super teams

Former Member
Former Member
What are your thoughts about teams combining for out of LMSC meets (not nationals) and not competing as the same team within the LMSC.
Parents
  • Mark, On the surface it would appear easy to separate the club teams from the SUPERTEAMS. Some are easy: All teams in CA (except SCAQ) are club teams. Illinois, Rocky Mountain, Kentucky, New England, etc. are not like the CA teams. Even people on these SUPERTEAMS ADMIT the difference! I do not know enough about how LMSC's are set up or what information USMS has. Looking at this website there is A LOT of information out there. Suggestions would be: 1) To ask the right questions. What makes a SUPERTEAM a SUPERTEAM? etc. Although that is the crux of it all. 2) Get a group together to sift through all of the information and see what delineations would be do-able? 3) Remember that the numbers of people attending Nationals is not important anymore. Again, this would be the perfect time to have club division vs. SUPERTEAM division, 1-10 combined= 20 places instead of 30 (men, women, combined).
Reply
  • Mark, On the surface it would appear easy to separate the club teams from the SUPERTEAMS. Some are easy: All teams in CA (except SCAQ) are club teams. Illinois, Rocky Mountain, Kentucky, New England, etc. are not like the CA teams. Even people on these SUPERTEAMS ADMIT the difference! I do not know enough about how LMSC's are set up or what information USMS has. Looking at this website there is A LOT of information out there. Suggestions would be: 1) To ask the right questions. What makes a SUPERTEAM a SUPERTEAM? etc. Although that is the crux of it all. 2) Get a group together to sift through all of the information and see what delineations would be do-able? 3) Remember that the numbers of people attending Nationals is not important anymore. Again, this would be the perfect time to have club division vs. SUPERTEAM division, 1-10 combined= 20 places instead of 30 (men, women, combined).
Children
No Data