At the convention I kept hearing...
"Swimming is the number one choice of exercise in adults" and
"Ask anyone and they'll be able to tell you gow beneficial swimming is" and similar phrases...
Well, I can't dipute the facty that swimming is good for you, one of the best forms of exercise there is.
Now, having said that, I can't help it notice that even in this 'day and age' where so many people are close to obsessed with fitness and exercise - especially in California - the USMS membership of some 40,000 is only 0.15% of the population of the US.
This leads me to think that we (the USMS) has missed the boat somewhere!!!
Coming back from my fiorst convention, I see that thewre is a lot of focus on competetive swimming, and most of the delegates and BOD nad EC are either current or former competetive swimmers, and naturally the focus would be on competing.
That alone is wonderful... BUT...
It is my understanding that close to 80% of the USMS membership consists of fitness swimmers.
Also, I hear that :
- in the last 2-3 years the USMS membership has been stagnating.
- USMS does want to grow in membership.
And...
at the convention, I see 'fitness' as being an auxiliary, almost a stepchild focus to the competetive side.
Don't get me wrong, I love to compete myself, BUT...
Competetive adult swimmers are a very narrow demographic and if USMS wants to grow, they (we) need to find more attractive ways to "build-educate-service" our potential fitness swimmers.
I find it puzzling that many 'fitness swimmers' will readily enter open water swims, but when they hear of a swim meet, they don't think they're good enough for it... I've done both, and let me tewll you, swim meets are much easier, especially for a first timer, then an open water mile swim in an ocean or a lake.
I also see coaches right here in this forum that are having a hard time explaining to their fitness swimmers why (other then insurance that some clubs require) they should be members of USMS.
I think USMS is failing in it's core objectives when it comes to attracting membership, servicing them and educatiing them, which I strongly believe will mostly come from the fitness side.
Well, this is all that comes to mind at the moment. I'm hoping to eventually refine the thoughts.
Comments, thoughts anyone? I'd love to have some dialogue about this and hear what other people think.
Parents
Former Member
Originally posted by emmett
But the other 85% of the users see it as item #10.
that's the 85% of computer users in general using Internet Explorer.
I'm discovering that a lot of swimmers tend to be more 'hands on' and less 'hands on the computer' kind of people. They spend their free time swimming - not learning computers and uopdting their windows service packs.
In my webmastering endeavors I've noticed that if I make a swimming website for more computer savvy people I lose more of the audience than I do with your regular run of the mill website.
Where you'd expect to lose 15% of the general audience, in the Active sports population segment that % is higher, maybe up to 25 or 30%.
Okay, this is a bit of a leap here, but let me do this to illustrate my point in different terms:
As for the USMS membership, 15% growth in membership would mean 6000 members... 25% would mean 10,000 members. 10,000 x $35 is $350,000 Not such a negligeable number afterall.
Originally posted by emmett
But the other 85% of the users see it as item #10.
that's the 85% of computer users in general using Internet Explorer.
I'm discovering that a lot of swimmers tend to be more 'hands on' and less 'hands on the computer' kind of people. They spend their free time swimming - not learning computers and uopdting their windows service packs.
In my webmastering endeavors I've noticed that if I make a swimming website for more computer savvy people I lose more of the audience than I do with your regular run of the mill website.
Where you'd expect to lose 15% of the general audience, in the Active sports population segment that % is higher, maybe up to 25 or 30%.
Okay, this is a bit of a leap here, but let me do this to illustrate my point in different terms:
As for the USMS membership, 15% growth in membership would mean 6000 members... 25% would mean 10,000 members. 10,000 x $35 is $350,000 Not such a negligeable number afterall.
