At the convention I kept hearing...
"Swimming is the number one choice of exercise in adults" and
"Ask anyone and they'll be able to tell you gow beneficial swimming is" and similar phrases...
Well, I can't dipute the facty that swimming is good for you, one of the best forms of exercise there is.
Now, having said that, I can't help it notice that even in this 'day and age' where so many people are close to obsessed with fitness and exercise - especially in California - the USMS membership of some 40,000 is only 0.15% of the population of the US.
This leads me to think that we (the USMS) has missed the boat somewhere!!!
Coming back from my fiorst convention, I see that thewre is a lot of focus on competetive swimming, and most of the delegates and BOD nad EC are either current or former competetive swimmers, and naturally the focus would be on competing.
That alone is wonderful... BUT...
It is my understanding that close to 80% of the USMS membership consists of fitness swimmers.
Also, I hear that :
- in the last 2-3 years the USMS membership has been stagnating.
- USMS does want to grow in membership.
And...
at the convention, I see 'fitness' as being an auxiliary, almost a stepchild focus to the competetive side.
Don't get me wrong, I love to compete myself, BUT...
Competetive adult swimmers are a very narrow demographic and if USMS wants to grow, they (we) need to find more attractive ways to "build-educate-service" our potential fitness swimmers.
I find it puzzling that many 'fitness swimmers' will readily enter open water swims, but when they hear of a swim meet, they don't think they're good enough for it... I've done both, and let me tewll you, swim meets are much easier, especially for a first timer, then an open water mile swim in an ocean or a lake.
I also see coaches right here in this forum that are having a hard time explaining to their fitness swimmers why (other then insurance that some clubs require) they should be members of USMS.
I think USMS is failing in it's core objectives when it comes to attracting membership, servicing them and educatiing them, which I strongly believe will mostly come from the fitness side.
Well, this is all that comes to mind at the moment. I'm hoping to eventually refine the thoughts.
Comments, thoughts anyone? I'd love to have some dialogue about this and hear what other people think.
Parents
Former Member
Originally posted by Conniekat8
One thing about seamless insurance... Providing that would mean that member end up carrying financial burden for non members. I think that is unfair to members. I wonder if the insurance compamies would see thhat as too much risk as they wouldn't be able to exactly quantify the numbers they are insuring. Perhaps there could be a 'club fee' for covering the non USMS swimmers. Just thinking out loud here.
The insurance company is not the limiting factor, USMS policy is. USMS could easily make blanket coverage available to teams, for an additional premium. Right now, teams that absolutely, positively HAVE to have uninterupted coverage must purchase insurance outside USMS. Once a club has this, USMS registration for swimmers is no longer needed. The larger the team, the more this option makes good business sense. What most teams do, though, is simply ignor the places where gaps appear in their coverage and hope it never catches up with them.
Originally posted by Conniekat8
I;ll have a look at the clubassistant. To my knowldge, USMS relies on the local LMSC's for club assistance.
Not that kind of assistance...Club Assistant is a club management software service that helps manage rosters, billing, communications and other administrative stuff that a well organized team needs. There are, to my knowledge, no LMSCs providing such services.
Originally posted by Conniekat8
One thing about seamless insurance... Providing that would mean that member end up carrying financial burden for non members. I think that is unfair to members. I wonder if the insurance compamies would see thhat as too much risk as they wouldn't be able to exactly quantify the numbers they are insuring. Perhaps there could be a 'club fee' for covering the non USMS swimmers. Just thinking out loud here.
The insurance company is not the limiting factor, USMS policy is. USMS could easily make blanket coverage available to teams, for an additional premium. Right now, teams that absolutely, positively HAVE to have uninterupted coverage must purchase insurance outside USMS. Once a club has this, USMS registration for swimmers is no longer needed. The larger the team, the more this option makes good business sense. What most teams do, though, is simply ignor the places where gaps appear in their coverage and hope it never catches up with them.
Originally posted by Conniekat8
I;ll have a look at the clubassistant. To my knowldge, USMS relies on the local LMSC's for club assistance.
Not that kind of assistance...Club Assistant is a club management software service that helps manage rosters, billing, communications and other administrative stuff that a well organized team needs. There are, to my knowledge, no LMSCs providing such services.
