I just read at" swiminfo.com" that the USMS board of directors voted to start "our" own magazine and no longer affiliate with SWIM. Their article presents the SWIM point of veiw,but it is a compelling argument against this action.What is the other side & what does everyone think?
Such a big rush to judgement. Maybe someone can explain the benefits of this move to those of us USMS members. SWIM Magazine is a good read but if we get something better, why is that such a bad thing? And, what reason do we have to believe that game wardens and managed care professionals are going to publish and edit the new magazine? For the record, I don't know any professional swimmers in USMS (although I'm sure there are some here and there) so the diversity of background might bring a unique perspective to a new magazine.
Such a big rush to judgement. Maybe someone can explain the benefits of this move to those of us USMS members. SWIM Magazine is a good read but if we get something better, why is that such a bad thing? And, what reason do we have to believe that game wardens and managed care professionals are going to publish and edit the new magazine? For the record, I don't know any professional swimmers in USMS (although I'm sure there are some here and there) so the diversity of background might bring a unique perspective to a new magazine.
