Cut From Yahoo News:
LAUSANNE, Switzerland - Transsexuals were cleared Monday to compete in the Olympics for the first time.
Under a proposal approved by the IOC executive board, athletes who have undergone sex-change surgery will be eligible for the Olympics if their new gender has been legally recognized and they have gone through a minimum two-year period of postoperative hormone therapy.
The decision, which covers both male-to-female and female-to-male cases, goes into effect starting with the Athens Olympics in August.
The IOC had put off a decision in February, saying more time was needed to consider all the medical issues.
Some members had been concerned whether male-to-female transsexuals would have physical advantages competing against women.
Men have higher levels of testosterone and greater muscle-to-fat ratio and heart and lung capacity. However, doctors say, testosterone levels and muscle mass drop after hormone therapy and sex-change surgery.
IOC spokeswoman Giselle Davies said the situation of transsexuals competing in high-level sports was "rare but becoming more common."
IOC medical director Patrick Schamasch said no specific sports had been singled out by the ruling.
"Any sport may be touched by this problem," he said. "Until now, we didn't have any rules or regulations. We needed to establish some sort of policy."
Until 1999, the IOC conducted gender verification tests at the Olympics but the screenings were dropped before the 2000 Sydney Games.
One of the best known cases of transsexuals in sports involves Renee Richards, formerly Richard Raskind, who played on the women's tennis tour in the 1970s.
In March, Australia's Mianne Bagger became the first transsexual to play in a pro golf tournament.
Michelle Dumaresq, formerly Michael, has competed in mountain bike racing for Canada.
Richards, now a New York opthamologist, was surprised by the IOC decision and was against it. She said decisions on transsexuals should be made on an individual basis.
"Basically, I think they're making a wrong judgment here, although I would have loved to have that judgment made in my case in 1976," she said.
"They're probably looking for trouble down the line. There may be a true transsexual — not someone who's nuts and wants to make money — who will be a very good champion player, and it will be a young person, let's say a Jimmy Connors or a Tiger Woods, and then they'll have an unequal playing field.
"In some sports, the physical superiority of men over women is very significant."
Parents
Former Member
“Finally, it is the case that Tom, either wittingly or unwittingly, starts the most controversial threads.”
Interesting observation, and factually it is unwittingly. With respect to this thread, I saw this article in Yahoo News and thought it was a topic that needed discussion. This topic has wide ranging implications for sports in general. Obviously, as we see here it also has some rather interesting moral and ethical implications as well. Looking back on the time line when I posted this thread, it’s plain to see that I waited an entire day to comment and when I did comment, I attempted to convey my thoughts in a humorous manner.
Unfortunately life is not always black and white; even though I tend to lean towards the side where things are black and white. In my case, reducing this topic to humor has no relevance to the seriousness, sensitivity or wide ranging implications surrounding this topic. It has to do with my inability to rationally find a comfort zone where I can honestly and openly convey my thoughts and feelings on this extremely controversial topic. By doing so, I allow myself the opportunity to read others thoughts and feeling on this matter and at the same time, continue to embrace the basic and fundamental ideas and principals that make me who I am.
“Finally, it is the case that Tom, either wittingly or unwittingly, starts the most controversial threads.”
Interesting observation, and factually it is unwittingly. With respect to this thread, I saw this article in Yahoo News and thought it was a topic that needed discussion. This topic has wide ranging implications for sports in general. Obviously, as we see here it also has some rather interesting moral and ethical implications as well. Looking back on the time line when I posted this thread, it’s plain to see that I waited an entire day to comment and when I did comment, I attempted to convey my thoughts in a humorous manner.
Unfortunately life is not always black and white; even though I tend to lean towards the side where things are black and white. In my case, reducing this topic to humor has no relevance to the seriousness, sensitivity or wide ranging implications surrounding this topic. It has to do with my inability to rationally find a comfort zone where I can honestly and openly convey my thoughts and feelings on this extremely controversial topic. By doing so, I allow myself the opportunity to read others thoughts and feeling on this matter and at the same time, continue to embrace the basic and fundamental ideas and principals that make me who I am.