Mark Foster and the Olympics

Former Member
Former Member
Goals have been clearly set for some time so those who qualify to the standards we’ve set will know they’re capable of returning from Athens having achieved something – they’re not simply going to the Olympic Games as excess baggage. This is a quote from a very Henryk Lakomy, Sports science & fitness director at British Swimming. So they feel that Mark Foster is excess baggage ! :mad: He could win a medal, but i guess we will never know and that is one less medal for Britain. Ah well, there is always the breaststroke. Which seems to be the only stroke that UK swimmers can do well !:mad:
Parents
  • Originally posted by swimmer He's not getting screwed. He didn't meet the published criteria. ... Take a look at the Japanese times. Many are faster than the actual Japanese records. We'll see but many of their winners are going to sit at home. Even some that make the Olympic A time. Are they getting screwed too? Here is my take. Yes, they knew about the standards in advance, but I think those standards are completely nuts. So in that sense, yes they are being screwed. ;) I thought it used to be an honor to just compete in the Olympics. The next time I think that people in the US are too obsessed with (gold) medels, I'll remember the trial standards set in Britain and Japan. Isn't there a school of thought that the only way to get experience/confidence in big games, is to compete in big games? (I hear this all the time in football and basketball: the advantage of playoff experience.) Newer swimmers, even if they aren't fast enough to medal now, could use these Olympics to work the jitters out, so they'll be ready for the *next* Olympics.
Reply
  • Originally posted by swimmer He's not getting screwed. He didn't meet the published criteria. ... Take a look at the Japanese times. Many are faster than the actual Japanese records. We'll see but many of their winners are going to sit at home. Even some that make the Olympic A time. Are they getting screwed too? Here is my take. Yes, they knew about the standards in advance, but I think those standards are completely nuts. So in that sense, yes they are being screwed. ;) I thought it used to be an honor to just compete in the Olympics. The next time I think that people in the US are too obsessed with (gold) medels, I'll remember the trial standards set in Britain and Japan. Isn't there a school of thought that the only way to get experience/confidence in big games, is to compete in big games? (I hear this all the time in football and basketball: the advantage of playoff experience.) Newer swimmers, even if they aren't fast enough to medal now, could use these Olympics to work the jitters out, so they'll be ready for the *next* Olympics.
Children
No Data