Thorpe Back in the 400?!?!!

Former Member
Former Member
If I am reading this right, Swiminfo.com is reporting that Craig Stevens is indeed going to back out of the 400 and leave it up to Australia Swimming to "pick another member of the Olympic Team" to swim that race in Athens. If I am ANY other country, swimmer, the 3rd place finisher at the Trials or an organization interested in ethics, then I am raising a stink on this one!!!! Thorpe DQ'd and the Aussies are going to skirt the rule and get him in anyway. They would be relegated to the status of Ben Johnson, Rosie Ruiz, and the 60+% of MLB who are on steriods! This is FREAKIN' UNBELIEVABLE. I have no respect for any of the aforementioned and if this happens, none for Ian Thorpe and the Australian swim federation (or whatever official name they hide behind) are in that seeming, stinking pile.
Parents
  • Originally posted by tjburk If Australia had changed their selection process prior to the trials, I would agree with you 100%, the fact is, they didn't! Next person in line goes, not the person that DQ'd! That is anywhere you go! What selection process was changed? Provide the proof. As I understand it no process was changed, there is an interpretation over the "next-ranking" phrase. You cannot continue to dwell on a rule change that you cannot quote and cannot prove.
Reply
  • Originally posted by tjburk If Australia had changed their selection process prior to the trials, I would agree with you 100%, the fact is, they didn't! Next person in line goes, not the person that DQ'd! That is anywhere you go! What selection process was changed? Provide the proof. As I understand it no process was changed, there is an interpretation over the "next-ranking" phrase. You cannot continue to dwell on a rule change that you cannot quote and cannot prove.
Children
No Data