I don't know if you guys are aware, but there is a list that shows the top 10 posters on the website. To be on that list, it requires 287 posts. I have 205 +/- However, it is not fair because most of the people (8 of 10) on the list joined the forum early on - in 2002. I have only been on for 11 months. This needs to be addressed. I say seperate top 10 posters lists.
Originally posted by emmett
.... did not get sucked in. I did not get sucked in. I did not get....
I believe Tom E. said it best: Did to... Did not... Did to... Did not... :D
Lefty, where there is a will, there is a way. Look at what Conniekat has accomplished. :eek:
How about a Top 10 Lurker List? I've been a member since August of '02 and have only 19 posts. I probably view this site a couple of times a day. I feel under represented and offended that my lack of contribution goes unrecognized...
How about those of us who suffer silently (or nearly so) through reams of posts by bitter malcontents bent on self-aggrandisement and posessed of no discernable interpersonal communication skills?
Each time the giant sucking sound occurred my teeth gnashed or my eyes rolled or my blood pressure rose and THEN, for the most part, I stayed my restless fingers from firing off a return volley. I DESERVE CREDIT!
We need a Top Ten List of Those Who Did Not Get Sucked Into the Ionosphere!
.... did not get sucked in. I did not get sucked in. I did not get....
Just as in swimming it’s not the number of posts that is important, it the distance per post that matters.
For my money, I think Emmett has one of the best distance per posts.
