When considering the overall speed of swimmers in the past and present it seems that although times are still dropping for swim events there is a "dropping off"graphically of time improvement..now do you think this could mean that there will be an ultimate saturated speed time that will never get beat?i think that unless we evolve say webbed feet or the like then this is possible....thoughts?
Parents
Former Member
Oh, one other thing: if you START swimming in your 20's (classifying you as a "late-bloomer,") but retire in your 40's or 50's, are you then reclassified as an "UN-bloomer."
Also, when would you be a "NON-bloomer?" (Maybe late 20's start, never heard of technique, missed the soccer calling, couldn't see the top-10 with a space shuttle?)
Who is responsible for the classifications? I don't have mine yet and I paid my monthly dues and really want to start my meetings.
Oh, one other thing: if you START swimming in your 20's (classifying you as a "late-bloomer,") but retire in your 40's or 50's, are you then reclassified as an "UN-bloomer."
Also, when would you be a "NON-bloomer?" (Maybe late 20's start, never heard of technique, missed the soccer calling, couldn't see the top-10 with a space shuttle?)
Who is responsible for the classifications? I don't have mine yet and I paid my monthly dues and really want to start my meetings.
