Hey Folks,
I recently swam the 100 fly in a time of 1:02.30 (scy). My splits per 25 were the following:
13.30
15.40
16.70
16.90
I took it out in a 28.70, came back in a 33.60 but the 25 splits for my last 50 were even (16.70, 16.90). Any suggestions on a faster 50? Again, it wasn't like I swam the last 25 a lot slower.
Thanks.
In an effort to win the overkill award, I've compiled some statistics based on the 50 and 100 fly at this year's NEM championships. There were about 100 swimmers in the 100 Butterfly this year. One of the benefits of running a results website is having tons of data at your fingertips. I thought maybe I should make use of it.
The page with the semi gory details is:
www.swimmingtimes.com/analysis
The short summary is that for the top 10 percent of performances the difference between the first and second fifty of the hundred was just over 3 seconds. For the entire event, the average difference was almost 5 seconds.
The difference between the 50 race and the first 50 of the 100 was just under a second and for the entire sample was about 2 1/4 seconds.
If anyone has any suggestions for other analysis to do on the data, I'm all ears. Now that the data is extracted for this admittedly small sample, maybe someone could tell us what it means... :)
-Jason
In an effort to win the overkill award, I've compiled some statistics based on the 50 and 100 fly at this year's NEM championships. There were about 100 swimmers in the 100 Butterfly this year. One of the benefits of running a results website is having tons of data at your fingertips. I thought maybe I should make use of it.
The page with the semi gory details is:
www.swimmingtimes.com/analysis
The short summary is that for the top 10 percent of performances the difference between the first and second fifty of the hundred was just over 3 seconds. For the entire event, the average difference was almost 5 seconds.
The difference between the 50 race and the first 50 of the 100 was just under a second and for the entire sample was about 2 1/4 seconds.
If anyone has any suggestions for other analysis to do on the data, I'm all ears. Now that the data is extracted for this admittedly small sample, maybe someone could tell us what it means... :)
-Jason
