This is somewhat related to another post I just started (Top Ten conerns). I noticed in the top ten list a number of swimmers (generally very fast swimmers) who swam their first nationals (or any other masters meet) in 5 years due to being in a new age group. I state this by looking at the past few years top ten lists and not seeing their names. Is this a good thing for masters swimming? Swimmers whose only affiliation with masters swimming is showing up to one meet every 5 years to break a record. These records should be owned by people that are true masters swimmers.
What is a true masters swimmers?- Perhaps doing a few meets a year might work. When I swam on an age group team as a child, I know in order to qualify for our championship meet, we had to swim at least 3 regular meets. Perhaps a rule like that for Nationals could begin to fix this problem-
If not, many of our national records will be held by "ringers"
Rob:
Your explanation was thorough and easy to understand. Thank you very much.
There are probably as many different reasons to be in Master's Swimming as there are swimmers. So, $30 or any figure is enough of a qualification for me.
Rob:
Your explanation was thorough and easy to understand. Thank you very much.
There are probably as many different reasons to be in Master's Swimming as there are swimmers. So, $30 or any figure is enough of a qualification for me.
