A photo of someone's butt isn't pornography.
This whole story is ridiculous. Some girls' suits ride up, others' don't. Who cares? Should a guy get DQed if you can see his butt crack?
Totally agree with the Anchorage School District's position:
Well, per the diagram I saw attached to one article, yes, a male swimmer could be DQ'd for plumber's crack, as the rule illustrated required suits to cover the buttocks entirely. Should he be is less relevant than would he be. Likely, no one would notice unless some chap's entire ass was hanging out. The fact that a female swimmer's purported cheek generates complaints, where a male's at the same meet wouldn't, is sexism in action. Adult men AND women are viewing a minor female athlete as having an ulterior sexual motive, not as an athlete paying more attention to her performance than her suit fit.
A photo of someone's butt isn't pornography.
This whole story is ridiculous. Some girls' suits ride up, others' don't. Who cares? Should a guy get DQed if you can see his butt crack?
Totally agree with the Anchorage School District's position:
Well, per the diagram I saw attached to one article, yes, a male swimmer could be DQ'd for plumber's crack, as the rule illustrated required suits to cover the buttocks entirely. Should he be is less relevant than would he be. Likely, no one would notice unless some chap's entire ass was hanging out. The fact that a female swimmer's purported cheek generates complaints, where a male's at the same meet wouldn't, is sexism in action. Adult men AND women are viewing a minor female athlete as having an ulterior sexual motive, not as an athlete paying more attention to her performance than her suit fit.
