From another thread:
> I have no interest in short distances since I have no fast-twitch fibers to speak of.
It's been decades since I was a physiology student, but I have to wonder if fast twitch fibers would be really all that useful to swimming, even to the short sprints. Maybe for 25s. I would think that larger cross sectional area of the swimming musculature (more available power) and the ability to recruit more muscle fibers simultaneously (using a larger fraction of the power on tap) would be more important for sprinting. Are there published studies which demonstrate that drop dead sprinters have a significantly different distribution of fast twitch and slow twitch muscle fibers than the rest of the swimming population?
Are there published studies which demonstrate that drop dead sprinters have a significantly different distribution of fast twitch and slow twitch muscle fibers than the rest of the swimming population?
I'd certainly like to know that since I come from a track & field background and that's what is ingrained in my head. Sprints and throwing events are all about recruiting fast twitch muscle cells.
An BTW Skip, I worked at GE R&D for many years.
Are there published studies which demonstrate that drop dead sprinters have a significantly different distribution of fast twitch and slow twitch muscle fibers than the rest of the swimming population?
I'd certainly like to know that since I come from a track & field background and that's what is ingrained in my head. Sprints and throwing events are all about recruiting fast twitch muscle cells.
An BTW Skip, I worked at GE R&D for many years.