I recently attended a TI workshop. It was very enlightening and I greatly improved my stroke over a weekend. During the class, the instructors emphasized that they were having the students exaggerate the movements (e.g. amount of rotation), but that the principles were proven effective and adhering to them would be the most efficient way to swim (longer, easier and faster).
When I got home, I reviewed my slow-motion videos of freestylers from the Sydney Olympics. Hardly any of the top swimmers (regardless of distance) were swimming on their sides or using "front-quadrant" swimming. Also, they slide their recovering arm into the water much further in front of their heads than TI advocates. Now I'm scratching my head. Is TI only designed to make mere mortals swim faster or is it useful for strong collegiate, masters and other swimmers as well? If the principles are so sound, why don't the best swimmers use them? Is it worth my while to try to swim the TI way (which involves A LOT of muscle re-training), even though my masters coach is giving me puzzled looks because my technique no longer resembles the rest of the team?
Any comments are appreciated -- especially from those who have taken and followed the TI methods, or who have taught them (Emmett, etc.). Thanks.
Parents
Former Member
Originally posted by GoRedFoxes
ACK! I hate the term "New Australian Crawl". An American Freestyler in the 84 olympics (can't remember his name, contact Larry VanWagner at Marist College for it) used this flat shoulder positioning and limited (almost non-existent) S curve stroke. I remember coaches criticizing his stroke tecnique because most US coaches were still in the dark ages when it came to pushing the S curve. Remember the critics of Janet Evans for her 'windmill' recovery?
Olympians using catch up free? Sprinters? :rolleyes:
Peace out
You're right -- the Australians probably didn't "invent" that style. But Australian coaches were the first who were willng to accept it and teach it to their swimmers. A swimmer who did it before the Australians used it (to great success) in 2000 was likely to be criticized and told to stop. From that standpoint, calling it the "new Australian crawl" seems justified.
Originally posted by GoRedFoxes
ACK! I hate the term "New Australian Crawl". An American Freestyler in the 84 olympics (can't remember his name, contact Larry VanWagner at Marist College for it) used this flat shoulder positioning and limited (almost non-existent) S curve stroke. I remember coaches criticizing his stroke tecnique because most US coaches were still in the dark ages when it came to pushing the S curve. Remember the critics of Janet Evans for her 'windmill' recovery?
Olympians using catch up free? Sprinters? :rolleyes:
Peace out
You're right -- the Australians probably didn't "invent" that style. But Australian coaches were the first who were willng to accept it and teach it to their swimmers. A swimmer who did it before the Australians used it (to great success) in 2000 was likely to be criticized and told to stop. From that standpoint, calling it the "new Australian crawl" seems justified.