I would like any suggestions on how to do this with a tape. (This is pretty non controversial, right?) I have spent a career trying to figure out how to measure things, and I am curious. From the comments in this group, the problems I mention below must have been solved.
First you stretch the tape along the side of the pool. That would work well, but how are you sure you are aligned with the walls, or that the walls are square? Also, you need to measure in several lanes, rather than the side.
So you get in the pool and hold the tape against the walls, 1 foot below water level. The problem is that the tape sags, and any measurement will overestimate the length of the pool by a significant amount. You could pull the tape tighter, but I suspect before the tape gets tight enough, your tape will stretch or break. (I used to assign that as an intro physics problem). I suppose you could build a support structure across the pool, but that would be a pain in the neck, and you would have to move it from lane to lane.
Getting the water out of the pool would make that support structure easier, but the water weighs a lot. It almost certainly causes the walls to bend outward, especially in the deeper pools. (How do the people who design above ground, temporary competition pools do it?) I don't know how much the walls will move, but how do you account for that? (and by the way, how do the masons make sure their plaster/tiling is correct in an empty pool?)
Here is an idea - you lower the water level by a foot or so, and build a *floating* support structure for the tape. I think that would solve most of the problems. Has anyone done that?
Short pool example:
If a 25y pool is ½” short…
Let’s take the example of a swimmer going 1:00.00 for a 100y race in this short pool. Therefore he/she is traveling 2 inches short of the full 100 yards (100 yards = 3600 inches):
(60 s)/(3598 in) = (? s)/(3600 in)
At this speed the swimmer’s time would be 1:00.03 if they had to swim the extra distance. Some of the USMS pools that are coming up short have been of the magnitude of ¼” inch so the extra time would be halved.
I'm not posting this to convey any opinions - just showing the math because the question was raised.
Jeff Roddin, P.E.
(Registered Professional Engineer, which means I may sign off on the USA Swimming pool measurement form since they require either a certified surveyor or a professional engineer.)
Short pool example:
If a 25y pool is ½” short…
Let’s take the example of a swimmer going 1:00.00 for a 100y race in this short pool. Therefore he/she is traveling 2 inches short of the full 100 yards (100 yards = 3600 inches):
(60 s)/(3598 in) = (? s)/(3600 in)
At this speed the swimmer’s time would be 1:00.03 if they had to swim the extra distance. Some of the USMS pools that are coming up short have been of the magnitude of ¼” inch so the extra time would be halved.
I'm not posting this to convey any opinions - just showing the math because the question was raised.
Jeff Roddin, P.E.
(Registered Professional Engineer, which means I may sign off on the USA Swimming pool measurement form since they require either a certified surveyor or a professional engineer.)