One of the very last posts of 2001 was from me on New Year's Eve. I don't remember whether the title was mine or the administrator who decided that it was a sub topic of something remotely connected with the subject that I was proposing. But, no matter.
Since the change of format this week to the new system, I don't know how to check it out or whether or not it makes any difference. However, after two weeks of no response of any kind and since it was my prerogative, being my birthday, the rare one that is divisable by both sevenses and elevenses, I went back to the subject to give it a boost, hoping that someone would give it some kind of notice. But, alas...
With Ground Hog's (or is it s'?) Day looming around the next corner I'm very much determined to thrust the subject forward a third time in the hope that it will get some serious attention. And it is about time whatever way you choose to take the title.
I don't remember everything I wrote the first two times but I'll simply make the proposal without any but the barest essential elaboration.
As soon as possible post all swimming times in seconds only!
Eliminate the use of minutes, or hours entirely. Having just yesterday having competed in the National Championship Event, The Hour Swim, (a Mail-in Event) I could consent to keeping the title. But for all listing and taking of times it would be 100% beneficial to use seconds only.
The only reason to oppose the notion that I can think of would be related to the existing hardware. But transpositions would be easily done until the mass of the hardware is ready to conform on its own. My guess being that the computer timing systems would need only a nudge to adapt.
Sprinters, of course, wouldn't understand what I'm talking about. But all swimmers who have a use for splits in their calculations run into stumbling blocks, not to mention common errors, that are bound to creep in whenever minutes become part of the results.
I have one other helpful suggestion to make on the subject, and because of the opportunity, why not... If Splits, for example, of a 200 or a 1500 were listed in reverse order, it would be infinitely easier and more instructive to see their value and significance.
Parents
Former Member
hey Ion! you were half right! and thanx for your interest.
About 200M359xx, that is.
At the time, I said that I would explain when I have the time to devote to it, but've got lots a thangs t'do before flying to Cleveland. I expect to be in heat one most of the time, but not always. See yez or y'all there.
In case anyone is interested, the Hoosier State Games masters results from last Saturday are on line now. Everything is there, including the no show indications. Everthing, splits for the 100's even.
Except for my 400IM! The timing system has left me to speculate how the 643.18 seconds were distributed. I can see what all the other swimmer's splits were, but am left to guess where it was that I caught up with and passed the younger woman in lane 2.
Chalk up another for my "bad genii"!
hey Ion! you were half right! and thanx for your interest.
About 200M359xx, that is.
At the time, I said that I would explain when I have the time to devote to it, but've got lots a thangs t'do before flying to Cleveland. I expect to be in heat one most of the time, but not always. See yez or y'all there.
In case anyone is interested, the Hoosier State Games masters results from last Saturday are on line now. Everything is there, including the no show indications. Everthing, splits for the 100's even.
Except for my 400IM! The timing system has left me to speculate how the 643.18 seconds were distributed. I can see what all the other swimmer's splits were, but am left to guess where it was that I caught up with and passed the younger woman in lane 2.
Chalk up another for my "bad genii"!