There's a story on swimswam (swimswam.com/.../) about Anthony Ervin swimming at USMS Nationals and the first comment states:
There is nothing better than going to a USMS meet and seeing swimmers like Anthony Ervin compete. It makes you feel like a 12 year old fan again!
In the same breath I will ask; what is the point of letting their times count as USMS records? They are professional two-a-day swimmers in the same age group categories as young professionals who might make a few practices per week. There is no way real Masters swimmers are able to train to be able to beat them. The professional swimmers wouldn’t be able to beat themselves with the same schedule afforded to the a real Masters swimmer. Thoughts?
My thoughts are that this is ridiculous. Anyone who is registered in USMS has as much right to set a record as anyone else. Who exactly is the arbiter of what a "real masters swimmer" is?
I really don't see the relevance to the question, but all members of usa cycling and usa triathlon are subject to in-competition and out of competition tests. In the past two years both organization have issued suspensions of amateurs for testing positive for performance enhancing drugs.
I really don't see the relevance to the question, but all members of usa cycling and usa triathlon are subject to in-competition and out of competition tests. In the past two years both organization have issued suspensions of amateurs for testing positive for performance enhancing drugs.
