Benchmarking progress - repeating sets often?

In a lot of the books, articles, vids, etc there are suggestions to do a set (like T20 or all out efforts) every 4 to 6 weeks to track training progress. Does anyone else do the same set every couple weeks (or even every week)? I've been doing this lately and seems to work for me. Maybe b/c I am so desperately out of shape and have such a poor swim strokes that I see progress each time I do a set. But, I am curious if others do this and if there is a particular name for this training style. TIA,
Parents
  • I used to have 4 core 'test sets' that I tried to repeat roughly on Monday in a 4 week cycle - 3 x 300 - to establish my BASE pace for training (got this set from Dave Salo, but I have described it when I wrote workouts for the High Volume Training thread here in 2012 and 2013). This was a great way for me to benchmark my overall fitness for swimming my target events (200 to 500 distance) Broken Mile - borrowed the idea of repeating this from Chris Stevenson and his workouts with NOVA Masters coach Mark Kutz. I would vary how I broke the mile, but still try to compare like for like 400 IM test set - this was my own development and has a few variations, but, as the 400 IM is the Greatest Race Of All Time and truly the only measure of a swimmer's greatness :agree:, it deserves it's own test set. Heart Rate test of 8 x 100 - again taken from Dave Salo's excellent Complete Conditioning for Swimming, this is a great test set for both speed and fitness. I won't say I religiously adhere to this 4 week cycle all year round, but when I am training for a focal event, I'm pretty good about it. I've also recently added a couple more test sets, variations on the 'Aussie' or 'Thorpe' or 'Hackett' 200 test set. Version 1 is the traditional version done as Set a starting INTERVAL (say 0:45) and INCREMENT (say 0:05) where you get about 5-10 seconds rest on your easy efforts on the first round 16 x 50: on INTERVAL, going 3 easy - 1 fast at target 200 race pace 12 x 50: on INTERVAL plus INCREMENT, going 2 easy - 1 fast at target 200 race pace 8 x 50: on INTERVAL plus INCREMENT x 2, going 1 easy - 1 fast at target 200 race pace 4 x 50: on INTERVAL plus INCREMENT x 3, going 3 easy - 1 fast at target 200 race pace My 'fun 400 variation' is as follows Same idea of INTERVAL and INCREMENT as above, adjusted for distance 4 rounds of 3 x 50 easy followed by 1 x 100 at target 400 or 500 race pace 4 rounds of 2 x 50 easy followed by 1 x 100 at target 400 or 500 race pace 4 rounds of 1 x 50 easy followed by 1 x 100 at target 400 or 500 race pace 4 rounds of 1 x 100 at target 400 or 500 race pace with 100 on INTERVAL x 2 As I kick my training back into high gear next week for Spring Nationals, I will aim to do one of those 'Aussie' test sets each week in addition to the 4 I listed above. I'm probably going to develop two more - One that focuses on trying to achieve certain times while constraining myself to a defined number of strokes per lap - aiming to work on distance per stroke and on 'drilling' a better feel of what stroke count and effort produces a specific time One that focuses on using a specific stroke rate (using a tempo trainer) and stroke count to achieve a defined time. I don't think there's a specific name for this type of training, but it seems logical to me to have some consistent sets you can benchmark yourself against over time.
Reply
  • I used to have 4 core 'test sets' that I tried to repeat roughly on Monday in a 4 week cycle - 3 x 300 - to establish my BASE pace for training (got this set from Dave Salo, but I have described it when I wrote workouts for the High Volume Training thread here in 2012 and 2013). This was a great way for me to benchmark my overall fitness for swimming my target events (200 to 500 distance) Broken Mile - borrowed the idea of repeating this from Chris Stevenson and his workouts with NOVA Masters coach Mark Kutz. I would vary how I broke the mile, but still try to compare like for like 400 IM test set - this was my own development and has a few variations, but, as the 400 IM is the Greatest Race Of All Time and truly the only measure of a swimmer's greatness :agree:, it deserves it's own test set. Heart Rate test of 8 x 100 - again taken from Dave Salo's excellent Complete Conditioning for Swimming, this is a great test set for both speed and fitness. I won't say I religiously adhere to this 4 week cycle all year round, but when I am training for a focal event, I'm pretty good about it. I've also recently added a couple more test sets, variations on the 'Aussie' or 'Thorpe' or 'Hackett' 200 test set. Version 1 is the traditional version done as Set a starting INTERVAL (say 0:45) and INCREMENT (say 0:05) where you get about 5-10 seconds rest on your easy efforts on the first round 16 x 50: on INTERVAL, going 3 easy - 1 fast at target 200 race pace 12 x 50: on INTERVAL plus INCREMENT, going 2 easy - 1 fast at target 200 race pace 8 x 50: on INTERVAL plus INCREMENT x 2, going 1 easy - 1 fast at target 200 race pace 4 x 50: on INTERVAL plus INCREMENT x 3, going 3 easy - 1 fast at target 200 race pace My 'fun 400 variation' is as follows Same idea of INTERVAL and INCREMENT as above, adjusted for distance 4 rounds of 3 x 50 easy followed by 1 x 100 at target 400 or 500 race pace 4 rounds of 2 x 50 easy followed by 1 x 100 at target 400 or 500 race pace 4 rounds of 1 x 50 easy followed by 1 x 100 at target 400 or 500 race pace 4 rounds of 1 x 100 at target 400 or 500 race pace with 100 on INTERVAL x 2 As I kick my training back into high gear next week for Spring Nationals, I will aim to do one of those 'Aussie' test sets each week in addition to the 4 I listed above. I'm probably going to develop two more - One that focuses on trying to achieve certain times while constraining myself to a defined number of strokes per lap - aiming to work on distance per stroke and on 'drilling' a better feel of what stroke count and effort produces a specific time One that focuses on using a specific stroke rate (using a tempo trainer) and stroke count to achieve a defined time. I don't think there's a specific name for this type of training, but it seems logical to me to have some consistent sets you can benchmark yourself against over time.
Children
No Data