Major 1650 sandbagging by a forum member

Former Member
Former Member
Looks like it is to gain 20 minutes of rest before doing the 400 IM. What do you folks think? Fair play or not? I say anyone attempting the 1650 and 400 IM back to back deserves some slack.
Parents
  • Honestly, I think I'm more open minded on the topic than you. :). I can see both sides, though I concede I don't like the name calling. I'm not sure I've ever seen you agree that there could be a valid or acceptable reason for sandbagging. Probably; I don't always see both sides of an issue as equally valid. I'm pretty firmly against terrorism and infanticide too.
Reply
  • Honestly, I think I'm more open minded on the topic than you. :). I can see both sides, though I concede I don't like the name calling. I'm not sure I've ever seen you agree that there could be a valid or acceptable reason for sandbagging. Probably; I don't always see both sides of an issue as equally valid. I'm pretty firmly against terrorism and infanticide too.
Children
No Data