Major 1650 sandbagging by a forum member

Former Member
Former Member
Looks like it is to gain 20 minutes of rest before doing the 400 IM. What do you folks think? Fair play or not? I say anyone attempting the 1650 and 400 IM back to back deserves some slack.
Parents
  • I did not even hint that I get annoyed or bothered by splits requests. Why attack me personally about needing to get a life when I was posing a philosophical question? I wasn't using the word "you" specifically to refer to you personally. Sorry, I didn't write that very well. I find it tiresome that people harp on split requests on bogus "ethical" grounds. Constant theme over the years on this forum ... Kirk's point is exactly right --- let people swim and get times. That's what we're going to meets for. I sympathize with Gull's point to a degree, but race conditions are rarely perfect. I have only used one split request (100 free split in 200 free last Dec.) other than relay leadoffs in over a year, so I have nothing particularly to be defensive about. I just don't like the moralizing.
Reply
  • I did not even hint that I get annoyed or bothered by splits requests. Why attack me personally about needing to get a life when I was posing a philosophical question? I wasn't using the word "you" specifically to refer to you personally. Sorry, I didn't write that very well. I find it tiresome that people harp on split requests on bogus "ethical" grounds. Constant theme over the years on this forum ... Kirk's point is exactly right --- let people swim and get times. That's what we're going to meets for. I sympathize with Gull's point to a degree, but race conditions are rarely perfect. I have only used one split request (100 free split in 200 free last Dec.) other than relay leadoffs in over a year, so I have nothing particularly to be defensive about. I just don't like the moralizing.
Children
No Data