Major 1650 sandbagging by a forum member

Former Member
Former Member
Looks like it is to gain 20 minutes of rest before doing the 400 IM. What do you folks think? Fair play or not? I say anyone attempting the 1650 and 400 IM back to back deserves some slack.
Parents
  • exactly how would you write such an anti-sandbagging rule?Any swimmer whose final time varies from his seed time by more than 6.626% shall be disqualified. This rule uses the male pronoun because sandbagging is for the most part a male shenanigan. And the rule uses 6.626, because who doesn’t love Planck's Constant?
Reply
  • exactly how would you write such an anti-sandbagging rule?Any swimmer whose final time varies from his seed time by more than 6.626% shall be disqualified. This rule uses the male pronoun because sandbagging is for the most part a male shenanigan. And the rule uses 6.626, because who doesn’t love Planck's Constant?
Children
No Data