Apparently USADA felt that his actions were particularly egregious. Most of the world agrees.That's a fairly naive view of the sport of cycling pre-2008. By 2008, it was pretty obvious that the sport was full of systemic doping and teams were doing everything they could to avoid detection. They are all particularly egregious. The only thing different about Armstrong's is that his was more successful.
Apparently USADA felt that his actions were particularly egregious. Most of the world agrees.That's a fairly naive view of the sport of cycling pre-2008. By 2008, it was pretty obvious that the sport was full of systemic doping and teams were doing everything they could to avoid detection. They are all particularly egregious. The only thing different about Armstrong's is that his was more successful.
