I'm working on a piece about obesity and the biological factors that can make sustaining significant wt loss so hard for so many people. The benefits of exercise, however, are not limited to the lean and abdominally chiseled! Even if swimming only helps you shed a couple pounds, or none at all, getting in shape can make a huge difference in life quality.
I have been playing around with a motivational strategy to encourage more people to compete regardless of their weight. To wit, my still-in-the-works concept, Jim's Weight-Weighted 50 SCY Free. This is likely to require substantial refinement (suggestions welcome!)
But as of now, my new metric is the soul of simplicity.
Just take your current season's best 50 SCY freestyle time and and divide this by your BMI, or body mass index. I am using the 50 SCY free because almost all of us can come up with this. You can also easily calculate your BMI by feeding your current height and weight in here (no cheating, please!): nhlbisupport.com/.../bminojs.htm
Clearly there are flaws in my metric. The first to jump out at me is that women's times, on average, tend to be a bit slower, especially on sprints, so we need to correct for this.
The current SCM world record (no world records for yards) for the 50 free is about 3 seconds faster for men than women. For purposes of my poll, women who agree to participate should subtract 3 seconds from their current season best 50!
I am, also arbitrarily, designating 1.0 as "par"--and your goal is to get your number as low as you can.
The Weight-Weighted Metric Exemplified
For example: take four men--
A) one with a BMI of 22, which places him or her squarely in the ranks of the lean
B) one with a BMI of 25, which puts him or her right on the cusp of an overweight categorization
C) one with a BMI of 30 (beginning of obesity )
D) one with a BMI of 33 (beginning of morbid obesity)
Now assume all four of these men can swim a 50 SCY freestyle in exactly 30 seconds.
Person A's "Jim's Weight-Weighted 50" would be 30/22 or 1.36
Person B earns a better 1.2
Person C achieves an even better 1.0
and Person D wins the day with a magnificent .91
If you recalculate these values for women, i.e., same BMIs but subtracting 3 seconds from their in season 50 SCY times, you get:
A: time of 27/ BMI of 22 = 1.23
B: 1.08
C: .9
D: .82
For what it's worth, I am a man, and my (admittedly lackluster) best 50 SCY free so far this year is 25.55.
I currently weigh 178 lb. and my height is 6' 1", which gives me a BMI is 23.5.
Thus my Jim's Jim's Weight-Weighted 50 is 25.55/23.5, or 1.087
There are two ways for me to get closer to par: swim faster, or gain weight.
Given the tremendous stigma on weight in our country, I don't think very many folks are likely to opt for the latter, or, for that matter, use my new metric as an incentive to eat more.
What I do think it could conceivably do is allow quite a few people now struggling with their weight to lay some legitimate claim to being--pound for pound--among the elite ranks in USMS swimming!
Give it a try!
fmracing is going to love this, me, not so much. It makes my already also-ran status fall to, well,... should I select the cyanide tablets of the handgun?
fmracing is going to love this, me, not so much. It makes my already also-ran status fall to, well,... should I select the cyanide tablets of the handgun?
Karl, are you trying to say you are both slow and skinny? Do the calculations anyway! I need more than one poll result to validate the concept!
Not a fan of BMI. At 25.8, I'm Overweight, yet 8% body fat the last time I was checked.
BMI is a crude measurement, and it's particularly unreliable for very muscular, large-boned people. The problem is that there aren't that many true Pro Athlete style mesomorphs out there (Herschel Walker's body fat percentage was measured at a negative 1 percent because he was so muscular, and no one would accuse him of being overweight or obese, at least in his glory days.) Alas, there are more than a few of us who believe we still have an Inner Herschel Walker living within an admitted, but presumably tiny, veneer of adiposity! PS, for what it's worth, it looks like there is a huge health benefit to losing as little as 5 lb. even though this doesn't put much of a dent into a person's obesity--it improves a host of physiological measures nonetheless.
WOO HOO... I'm obese! 6'1 and 250. So at 33 bmi, me swimming a 50 at 36 secs is equivalent to you going about 25.55... wow. I like this. Or you doing about a 21.4 50 equivalent... dang.... Maybe I don't want to lose weight! HA!
I will say i've lost 5 lbs in the last week and do feel quicker...
I do know there's some guys out there no taller than me and well over 200 lb. who can still bust a 22.x 50 free. Somebody who can swim a 22 with a BMI of 28 would make it into the .70- .79 range, which I personally consider pretty remarkable. Ditto for someone who can swim a 26 who has a BMI of 33. Either way, I think it would be very impressive.
Please note: I checked the box allowing people to take my poll anonymously, so please consider doing it even if you are feeling modest! No one will be the wiser unless you opt to discuss your scoring in the discussion section!
Clearly there are flaws in my metric. The first to jump out at me is that women's times, on average, tend to be a bit slower, especially on sprints, so we need to correct for this.
The current SCM world record (no world records for yards) for the 50 free is about 3 seconds faster for men than women. For purposes of my poll, women who agree to participate should subtract 3 seconds from their current season best 50!
Probably better would be a multiplication factor for women. For example, if women tend to be around 10% slower than males in a 50 free, women could simply multiply their time by 0.9. I think this make more sense that adding an arbitrary 3 seconds.
Likewise, those with 50 meter times (short course) could multiply by 0.91 to get an equivalent 50 yard time.
Probably better would be a multiplication factor for women. For example, if women tend to be around 10% slower than males in a 50 free, women could simply multiply their time by 0.9. I think this make more sense that adding an arbitrary 3 seconds.
Likewise, those with 50 meter times (short course) could multiply by 0.91 to get an equivalent 50 yard time.
I think you are onto something here. Probably to make it as accurate as possible, I could look at the TT in the men's and women's age groups and see what the percent differential is. Because there are always freakish outliers like Rich A. and Leslie L., maybe I should take the 3rd place times?
I'd also like to figure out a way to adapt this to events other than the 50 free.
Still cogitating...
Thanks for the excellent suggestion!
Speaking of freakish outliers, I have a sneaking suspicion that one of our favorite's has just taken full advantage of her 3 second subtraction figure and set a new record for this poll! Would you like to comment, mystery .70 - .79 outstanding achiever? And if you are who I think you are, do you think the 3 second subtraction is too generous for women given that you can beat me without any subtraction whatsoever???
I took my 50 free LCM best time from last season and converted it to SCY. I don't swim 50 free SCY...
Does this alter my result?
My BMI is 23.3. I'm way too muscular for this calculation! My 50 free LCM converts to a 23.8 SCY.
My SCM converts to 25.55 as SCY, and my BMI per chart is 21.5%;
25.55 ÷ 21.5 = 1.19
Easiest way to improve will be from eating more but that gets expensive.
I bet fmr is in the 0.8's, he is super fast