I don't assume that the bulkheads were NEVER moved. Probably after LC season they were set, measured and remained in one place. I assume they were checked visually before and after the meet. I assume that they were measured pursuant to FINA's standards. Why do you asume they were moved and why do you assume the course was short? FINA believes the pool was not short.
I think in this case the Canadians and FINA are in a better position to make that determination than you, or I, or anyone else who is not privy to the information provided by Montreal to FINA.
The assumption I make is that the pool was 25M since FINA and Canada say so. That assumption is reasonable under the circumstances. To assume w/o proof that the pool was short is not a reasonable assumption.
I don't assume that the bulkheads were NEVER moved. Probably after LC season they were set, measured and remained in one place. I assume they were checked visually before and after the meet. I assume that they were measured pursuant to FINA's standards. Why do you asume they were moved and why do you assume the course was short? FINA believes the pool was not short.
I think in this case the Canadians and FINA are in a better position to make that determination than you, or I, or anyone else who is not privy to the information provided by Montreal to FINA.
The assumption I make is that the pool was 25M since FINA and Canada say so. That assumption is reasonable under the circumstances. To assume w/o proof that the pool was short is not a reasonable assumption.
