USMS Rule 202.1.1.A
“Applications for sanction shall be made to the LMSC within which the event is to be held,…”
I would suggest that “is to be held” implicitly (if not explicitly) precludes retroactive sanctioning. And I believe that is how prior interpretations have been passed down.
That's not explicit.
It's certainly better reasoning than I heard fairly recently for yanking a retroactive sanction -- "because it was the right thing to do."
USMS Rule 202.1.1.A
“Applications for sanction shall be made to the LMSC within which the event is to be held,…”
I would suggest that “is to be held” implicitly (if not explicitly) precludes retroactive sanctioning. And I believe that is how prior interpretations have been passed down.
That's not explicit.
It's certainly better reasoning than I heard fairly recently for yanking a retroactive sanction -- "because it was the right thing to do."
