Yes, that too. And in advance, not retroactively. Though apparently nothing in the rules explicitly precludes retroactive sanction.
USMS Rule 202.1.1.A
“Applications for sanction shall be made to the LMSC within which the event is to be held,…”
I would suggest that “is to be held” implicitly (if not explicitly) precludes retroactive sanctioning. And I believe that is how prior interpretations have been passed down.
Yes, that too. And in advance, not retroactively. Though apparently nothing in the rules explicitly precludes retroactive sanction.
USMS Rule 202.1.1.A
“Applications for sanction shall be made to the LMSC within which the event is to be held,…”
I would suggest that “is to be held” implicitly (if not explicitly) precludes retroactive sanctioning. And I believe that is how prior interpretations have been passed down.
