Does anyone know what the technical deficiency is?
In another thread, jaadams1 posted a link to the minutes of the February 26, 2012 meeting of the Records & Tabulations Committee:
www.usms.org/.../records-2012-2-26-1.pdf
The relevant section:
Discussion on whether to apply for a Rules Exemption to include Canadian 2011 SCM Nationals in the SCM 2011 Top Ten lists
There are three reasons these times were not included:
1. The submission deadline was missed (violates Article 105.1.2).　
2. It is the responsibility of the swimmer to submit times with complete documentation to the appropriate LMSC Top 10 recorder (violates Article 202.2).
3. Pool measurement requirements were not met (violates Article 105.1.7C-D).
A motion is proposed to accept 2011 Canadian SCM National results ... The motion fails by a vote of 4-3.
That looks pretty official to me.
Does anyone know what the technical deficiency is?
In another thread, jaadams1 posted a link to the minutes of the February 26, 2012 meeting of the Records & Tabulations Committee:
www.usms.org/.../records-2012-2-26-1.pdf
The relevant section:
Discussion on whether to apply for a Rules Exemption to include Canadian 2011 SCM Nationals in the SCM 2011 Top Ten lists
There are three reasons these times were not included:
1. The submission deadline was missed (violates Article 105.1.2).　
2. It is the responsibility of the swimmer to submit times with complete documentation to the appropriate LMSC Top 10 recorder (violates Article 202.2).
3. Pool measurement requirements were not met (violates Article 105.1.7C-D).
A motion is proposed to accept 2011 Canadian SCM National results ... The motion fails by a vote of 4-3.
That looks pretty official to me.
