In my most recent blog entry, "One Man's Garbage..." forums.usms.org/blog.php , I asked my fellow swimmers their respective opinions on the impact long, slow, continuous swimming has on meet performance.
The expression "garbage yards" (and the pejorative overtones such a phrase conjurs) has become so embedded in the forum lexicon that many, I suspect, now consider as indisputable truth swimming this way is a waste of time for anyone with competitive ambitions.
Such a view appears particularly well-entrenched among the many non-credentialed exercise physiology pontificators here on the forums who also have a fondness for sprinting and dry land exercise.
But is the concept of garbage yards truly valid--or a kind of urban legend made up largely by sprinters who would rather be doing something other than spending 90 minutes without stopping in the pool?
I don't mean only practicing this way. But if you are, like me, inclined to enjoy swimming, once or twice a week, long, slow, relatively relaxing, continuous yards, do you believe (and more importantly, perhaps, have any evidence to bolster said belief) that so-called "garbage yards" can have some value for actual racing?
Or do these only teach your body to swim slow?
I invite you to read my recent blog forums.usms.org/blog.php and post your thoughts advice there or here.
At the risk of provoking censure by the forum authorities, I furthermore ask you to leave all civility by the wayside.
Feel free to trash talk and smack upside the head of any and every one who disagrees with your personal bias here!
It's been way too long since these forums have had a good, old-fashioned range war of opinions run amuk and ad hominem attacks!
Go at each other tooth and claw. It will only stir the blood of us all, I say--something we garbage yard enthusiasts probably need a bit more of, I will admit.
Rob, with all due respect to the Presidential Office that you hold, I must say you are incorrect here, sir!
Imagine, for the sake of explication, two athletes: Usain Boldt and a somewhat hypothetical version of yourself.
So who "works" harder, a masters or young stud swimmer? Interesting question. Rather than try to compare myself with some current elite athlete, maybe I can brave the waters of unreliable memory and compare myself as I am now to myself at 20. I was significantly faster then and tired much less quickly.
I have heard or read somewhere that there are two physiological changes with age that no amount of exercise or training will halt: decrease in max HR and decrease in lung capacity.
The HR I can (as much as my aging memory banks allow) attest to: I seem to remember hitting the 200+ bpm range routinely in practice in college and HS, and there is no way I can touch that now.
In races, I feel like when I was younger I had a 5th gear that I no longer possess; in fact, I'm not sure if I even have a 4th gear. By that I mean that my times in practice are now closer to my race times than I remember being the case when younger.
I don't think I work harder in practice now than I did. But -- much like a new car -- I could really rev the engine up when younger and push myself to limits that I simply cannot match right now.
So maybe that means I was working harder in races then. But races nowadays are definitely not less painful now than they were.
Rob, with all due respect to the Presidential Office that you hold, I must say you are incorrect here, sir!
Imagine, for the sake of explication, two athletes: Usain Boldt and a somewhat hypothetical version of yourself.
So who "works" harder, a masters or young stud swimmer? Interesting question. Rather than try to compare myself with some current elite athlete, maybe I can brave the waters of unreliable memory and compare myself as I am now to myself at 20. I was significantly faster then and tired much less quickly.
I have heard or read somewhere that there are two physiological changes with age that no amount of exercise or training will halt: decrease in max HR and decrease in lung capacity.
The HR I can (as much as my aging memory banks allow) attest to: I seem to remember hitting the 200+ bpm range routinely in practice in college and HS, and there is no way I can touch that now.
In races, I feel like when I was younger I had a 5th gear that I no longer possess; in fact, I'm not sure if I even have a 4th gear. By that I mean that my times in practice are now closer to my race times than I remember being the case when younger.
I don't think I work harder in practice now than I did. But -- much like a new car -- I could really rev the engine up when younger and push myself to limits that I simply cannot match right now.
So maybe that means I was working harder in races then. But races nowadays are definitely not less painful now than they were.
