In my most recent blog entry, "One Man's Garbage..." forums.usms.org/blog.php , I asked my fellow swimmers their respective opinions on the impact long, slow, continuous swimming has on meet performance.
The expression "garbage yards" (and the pejorative overtones such a phrase conjurs) has become so embedded in the forum lexicon that many, I suspect, now consider as indisputable truth swimming this way is a waste of time for anyone with competitive ambitions.
Such a view appears particularly well-entrenched among the many non-credentialed exercise physiology pontificators here on the forums who also have a fondness for sprinting and dry land exercise.
But is the concept of garbage yards truly valid--or a kind of urban legend made up largely by sprinters who would rather be doing something other than spending 90 minutes without stopping in the pool?
I don't mean only practicing this way. But if you are, like me, inclined to enjoy swimming, once or twice a week, long, slow, relatively relaxing, continuous yards, do you believe (and more importantly, perhaps, have any evidence to bolster said belief) that so-called "garbage yards" can have some value for actual racing?
Or do these only teach your body to swim slow?
I invite you to read my recent blog forums.usms.org/blog.php and post your thoughts advice there or here.
At the risk of provoking censure by the forum authorities, I furthermore ask you to leave all civility by the wayside.
Feel free to trash talk and smack upside the head of any and every one who disagrees with your personal bias here!
It's been way too long since these forums have had a good, old-fashioned range war of opinions run amuk and ad hominem attacks!
Go at each other tooth and claw. It will only stir the blood of us all, I say--something we garbage yard enthusiasts probably need a bit more of, I will admit.
Something like 8-10 x 50 AFAP @ 2-3:00 will help your 100 and sprint endurance more than 10 x 100 @ 1:30 or, even worse, 10 x 200 @ 3:00.
I'd probably agree that 10 x 50s AFAP will help your race 100 a little more than 10x100, but they both help, and in different ways. What's more, it isn't exactly an either/or choice: the sets aren't mutually exclusive.
In terms of training for sprinting (or any distance really), another facet is that it isn't just about training to be good for one 50 or 100, but to recover between races and be strong even on the last day of the meet. Besides how one designs particular sets, this might involve doing back-to-back(-to-back) quality workouts on occasion.
Something like 8-10 x 50 AFAP @ 2-3:00 will help your 100 and sprint endurance more than 10 x 100 @ 1:30 or, even worse, 10 x 200 @ 3:00.
I'd probably agree that 10 x 50s AFAP will help your race 100 a little more than 10x100, but they both help, and in different ways. What's more, it isn't exactly an either/or choice: the sets aren't mutually exclusive.
In terms of training for sprinting (or any distance really), another facet is that it isn't just about training to be good for one 50 or 100, but to recover between races and be strong even on the last day of the meet. Besides how one designs particular sets, this might involve doing back-to-back(-to-back) quality workouts on occasion.
