In my most recent blog entry, "One Man's Garbage..." forums.usms.org/blog.php , I asked my fellow swimmers their respective opinions on the impact long, slow, continuous swimming has on meet performance.
The expression "garbage yards" (and the pejorative overtones such a phrase conjurs) has become so embedded in the forum lexicon that many, I suspect, now consider as indisputable truth swimming this way is a waste of time for anyone with competitive ambitions.
Such a view appears particularly well-entrenched among the many non-credentialed exercise physiology pontificators here on the forums who also have a fondness for sprinting and dry land exercise.
But is the concept of garbage yards truly valid--or a kind of urban legend made up largely by sprinters who would rather be doing something other than spending 90 minutes without stopping in the pool?
I don't mean only practicing this way. But if you are, like me, inclined to enjoy swimming, once or twice a week, long, slow, relatively relaxing, continuous yards, do you believe (and more importantly, perhaps, have any evidence to bolster said belief) that so-called "garbage yards" can have some value for actual racing?
Or do these only teach your body to swim slow?
I invite you to read my recent blog forums.usms.org/blog.php and post your thoughts advice there or here.
At the risk of provoking censure by the forum authorities, I furthermore ask you to leave all civility by the wayside.
Feel free to trash talk and smack upside the head of any and every one who disagrees with your personal bias here!
It's been way too long since these forums have had a good, old-fashioned range war of opinions run amuk and ad hominem attacks!
Go at each other tooth and claw. It will only stir the blood of us all, I say--something we garbage yard enthusiasts probably need a bit more of, I will admit.
I didn't participate in the poll as it looks like"heads I win tails you lose."
1) is pro distance
2)is pro distance
3) is neutral
Come on.
Exactly, I didn't vote either.
Here are my thoughts:
1. That Guy is a smart guy and remembers my definition correctly.
2. Jimby is equating slow aerobic swimming with garbage yards, and I don't necessarily agree with that. I've done two slow aerobic workouts this week. They weren't garbage -- I did drills, hypoxic work and they helped clear lactic acid and set up my speed workouts.
3. Patrick tends to be one of those mentally deranged animal lane swimmers, and so must be ignored when posturing as above.
4. Garbage = a steady diet of almost nothing but moderate short rest aerobic work. Most pool swimmers, not just sprinters, need some quality race pace work.
5. Sprinters are not wall resters. We do recovery swimming between fast efforts. (Though I suppose to the Patrick followers anything over 15 seconds rest is to be avoided at all costs. Regrettable.) As a result of this, I frequently spend 90 minutes in the pool.
I didn't participate in the poll as it looks like"heads I win tails you lose."
1) is pro distance
2)is pro distance
3) is neutral
Come on.
Exactly, I didn't vote either.
Here are my thoughts:
1. That Guy is a smart guy and remembers my definition correctly.
2. Jimby is equating slow aerobic swimming with garbage yards, and I don't necessarily agree with that. I've done two slow aerobic workouts this week. They weren't garbage -- I did drills, hypoxic work and they helped clear lactic acid and set up my speed workouts.
3. Patrick tends to be one of those mentally deranged animal lane swimmers, and so must be ignored when posturing as above.
4. Garbage = a steady diet of almost nothing but moderate short rest aerobic work. Most pool swimmers, not just sprinters, need some quality race pace work.
5. Sprinters are not wall resters. We do recovery swimming between fast efforts. (Though I suppose to the Patrick followers anything over 15 seconds rest is to be avoided at all costs. Regrettable.) As a result of this, I frequently spend 90 minutes in the pool.
