Imagine you get to arrange four swimmers into a freestyle relay team. They are within ~10% difference when it comes to times.
Would you do the most popular arrangement?
1st leg - 2nd fastest swimmer
2nd leg - 3rd fastest swimmer
3rd leg - slowest swimmer
4th leg - fastest swimmer
...or a different one? Would you consider other factors besides speed such as personality, experience, etc.? Does it make a difference if it is 4x50 or 4x200?
So what order would you put them in?
I would first let them decide among themselves. It's masters, we're all adults, and I cannot recall the coach ever deciding for us. We seemed to know for each relay what to do.
If someone wants a split, they should lead.
Times alone should not dicate order. Some people are better relays swimmers than others. I personally like to go 2nd or 3rd IF I am not getting a split. I don't like going 4th, because I swim really fast as 2nd, 3rd, or 4th, and I don't need the extra umph of anchoring RELATIVE to other relay swimmers. Or how about if it was a MIXED relay? That could also determine how you want to stack your swimmers. Or how about trying to anticipate a race with another team in particular, so you'd line up your order according to how they line up theirs.
Last, you could always do the "draw the name out of a hat", which is really fun for medley relays.
Fastest.
2nd Fastest.
3rd Fastest.
4th Fastest.
(I don't believe in slowness...) After all, then your fastest swimmers are there to psych up, coach and/or calm down your less fast swimmer. It puts the team out in front early, possibly taking the heart out of other team's slowbies who see how far behind they are!
The club coach here almost always shotguns his freestyle relays (fastest followed by second fastest). I believe your best racer might not necessarily be your "fastest" swimmer, but actually the person who thrives the most off the thrill of anchoring a relay. That person should go last.
If you have someone with a quick reaction time, you might consider putting them first. Or perhaps if you have someone that chronically jumps early on relay exchanges. As mentioned before, offer the first slot to anyone looking for a split. My team did that for me once and I greatly appreciated it.
The anchor leg is the only other one I'd worry about. Depending upon how important the race is, this leg can have some pressure associated with it. Some people thrive off it. Others hate it. This person doesn't need to be the fastest but you don't want someone who is going to turn into a basket case if they think they might lose it for the team.
Former Member
Sometimes the situation enters into the decision, such as dual meets.
Former Member
How I've seen most success if your mixing very fast swimmers with one slow swimmer or just a younger swimmer is:
Second Fastest
Fastest
Third Fastest
Slowest
This gives you such a big lead that for the slowest its easier to hold them off :D
It was a great counter for the usual stack cause the fastest goes against their slowest.
Former Member
1) If you've got someone without much relay start experience, put that person first.
2) Put your best racer last.
THIS... or, the weakest relay starter goes first. I had plenty of experience, but still very poor relay starts. Led off almost every free relay I was ever on back in college because my flat start was pretty good back then.
Former Member
As an age grouper and in Master's we always went:
2nd fastest
slowest
2nd slowest
fastest
I don't think strategy ever came into it!