The Mystery of the Breaststroke Armpull

Former Member
Former Member
A friendly difference of opinion arose this week between Ande and Allen, two USMS greats, about the best technique for the breaststroke armpull. The exchange occurred deep into an otherwise unrelated thread, so I thought a new thread might give the subject wider attention. Here follows an amateur's take on the two techniques for breaststroke armpull; hopefully the experts will then finetune the issue. One technique involves a shallower, wider, more circular motion of the arms, "like wiping the inside of two big bowls," as Paul Bergen is quoted in Whitten's Complete Book of Swimming. Whitten also describes the motion as a "heart-shape pattern," which involves a sculling outsweep, catch, insweep and recovery. This technique is considered quick, smooth, and easy to accelerate through in the insweep-to-recovery phase, as the path is fairly circular, continuous and shallow. The other technique attempts a straighter pull, using an early vertical forearm, with some similarities to the butterfly armpull. The outsweep is less pronounced, or as Jim Montgomery writes in Mastering Swimming, the "sweep-out is more of a slow and deliberate stretch than a deliberate movement." Then, as Cecil Colwin describes in Breakthrough Swimming, "the hands are planed directly backward." The advantages to this technique are presumed to be the superior propulsion offered by a straighter armpull, made deeper by a vertical forearm. The disadvantages could be that the arms and hands have to turn a sharper corner to begin recovery, and from a deeper level, which might create a resistance hitch. The two techniques share a high elbow position; the shallower heart-shape pull has been around longer than the deeper straight pull. Elite swimmers use both techniques with success, and many use what appears to be a hybrid of the two techniques. One explanation for a swimmer's preference for one technique over another may be stroke count. A breaststroker who uses a higher stroke count generally, or is primarily a sprinter, may prefer the quicker heart-shape pull. One who uses a lower stroke count, or swims longer events, may prefer the presumably more propulsive straight pull. The increasing popularity of the straight pull may be a reflection of the fact that stroke counts as a long-term trend are dropping across most strokes and events. For example, Grant Hackett set his 1500 freestyle record ten years ago using (on average) 17 stroke cycles per length. Sun Yang almost beat it recently using an average of 14-1/2 stroke cycles per length. Rebecca Soni has evolved over the years from a heart-shape breaststroke armpull to something straighter, while her stroke counts have decreased.
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    The breaststroke kick and pull can contribute unequal percentages of power to the end time / race. Some swimmers can kick faster while other can pull faster. It's important for breaststokers to isolate their pull and kick (a simple timed length or two) to find out the effectiveness of each. Strength is the major determinant of an effective pulling pattern while flexibility in the major determinant of an effective kicking patter (narrow knees / wider feet). Improving a swimmer's strength may be the most effective means of improving their pull. The effective use of drag (EVF) and lift (45 degree hand pitch away and toward midline) make the pulling pattern different from swimmer to swimmer. With this being said, it takes a very experinced coach who can not only analyze the strengths and weaknesses but then advise the appropriate technical treatments needed for the swimmer to improve. So, find out your 25 pull and kick time, have a coach video your stroke pattern then let them make appropriate changes. Swimmers should try to improve both their kick and pull efficiency but when one is clearly deficient the course of action to correct the clear deficiency must take priority. Because the EVF and the amount of time spent in the EVF is so short for the breaststroke, every breaststroker should try to improve it. The lift force will never create more power than drag force but the fluid transition of both is paramount to an effective pull. The breaststroker, unlike the other competitive strokes, can use their lats (as they're pulling and finishing their stroke with their elbows closing to their ribs). The complexity of this stroke make it one of the most difficult to teach. Breaststrokers are.... well.... breaststrokers. Coco Chanel the famous fashion designer must have been talking to a breaststroker when she said, "In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different."
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    The breaststroke kick and pull can contribute unequal percentages of power to the end time / race. Some swimmers can kick faster while other can pull faster. It's important for breaststokers to isolate their pull and kick (a simple timed length or two) to find out the effectiveness of each. Strength is the major determinant of an effective pulling pattern while flexibility in the major determinant of an effective kicking patter (narrow knees / wider feet). Improving a swimmer's strength may be the most effective means of improving their pull. The effective use of drag (EVF) and lift (45 degree hand pitch away and toward midline) make the pulling pattern different from swimmer to swimmer. With this being said, it takes a very experinced coach who can not only analyze the strengths and weaknesses but then advise the appropriate technical treatments needed for the swimmer to improve. So, find out your 25 pull and kick time, have a coach video your stroke pattern then let them make appropriate changes. Swimmers should try to improve both their kick and pull efficiency but when one is clearly deficient the course of action to correct the clear deficiency must take priority. Because the EVF and the amount of time spent in the EVF is so short for the breaststroke, every breaststroker should try to improve it. The lift force will never create more power than drag force but the fluid transition of both is paramount to an effective pull. The breaststroker, unlike the other competitive strokes, can use their lats (as they're pulling and finishing their stroke with their elbows closing to their ribs). The complexity of this stroke make it one of the most difficult to teach. Breaststrokers are.... well.... breaststrokers. Coco Chanel the famous fashion designer must have been talking to a breaststroker when she said, "In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different."
Children
No Data