first of all, congrats to the meet directors and all the volunteers on a job well done. so organized and efficient!! very impressive. the only thing i wish someone could explain to me is why the usms champ. committee changed the team scoring from large, medium and small team to clumping everyone in the same category. seems extremely unfair to have what i call "real teams" competing against state mega teams. there is no possibility for "real teams" to ever come close to competing against them. if you are going to give team awards at the end of the meet, is there any way you can do it fairly? our team is extremely proud to have gotten as many team members as we did to go to natls. (most of them for the first time), but unfortunately they were very disillusioned (as was i) with the idea that we would be competing against state teams. as one of the coaches i didn't have an explanation. even though we were very proud of our 7th place finish in men's division, and our 12th place in combined, we were only one of a few "real teams" in the top ten. would appreciate responses. maybe even someone from the champ.committee could explain how they felt this scoring system would be more fair to the majority of swimmers. then i can pass it along to my teammates.. i don't want them to be so disillusioned that they lose interest in attending any future natls. thanks
Personally, I would still like to see USMS spend more time with projects and discussions that have greater consequences, such as the professional management guidelines. However, we do have a "Splashback" column on the topic in the May/June issue of SWIMMER, which should be hitting your mailboxes any day now.
One of the most interesting things we discovered during the process of researching the column was the USMS History and Archives Committee doesn't have a list of Club Champions dating back to the beginning of club scoring.
So, basically, we're having this whole discussion without even knowing what our history truly is.
IMHO, that's completely lame.
Personally, I would still like to see USMS spend more time with projects and discussions that have greater consequences, such as the professional management guidelines. However, we do have a "Splashback" column on the topic in the May/June issue of SWIMMER, which should be hitting your mailboxes any day now.
One of the most interesting things we discovered during the process of researching the column was the USMS History and Archives Committee doesn't have a list of Club Champions dating back to the beginning of club scoring.
So, basically, we're having this whole discussion without even knowing what our history truly is.
IMHO, that's completely lame.
