team scoring

Former Member
Former Member
first of all, congrats to the meet directors and all the volunteers on a job well done. so organized and efficient!! very impressive. the only thing i wish someone could explain to me is why the usms champ. committee changed the team scoring from large, medium and small team to clumping everyone in the same category. seems extremely unfair to have what i call "real teams" competing against state mega teams. there is no possibility for "real teams" to ever come close to competing against them. if you are going to give team awards at the end of the meet, is there any way you can do it fairly? our team is extremely proud to have gotten as many team members as we did to go to natls. (most of them for the first time), but unfortunately they were very disillusioned (as was i) with the idea that we would be competing against state teams. as one of the coaches i didn't have an explanation. even though we were very proud of our 7th place finish in men's division, and our 12th place in combined, we were only one of a few "real teams" in the top ten. would appreciate responses. maybe even someone from the champ.committee could explain how they felt this scoring system would be more fair to the majority of swimmers. then i can pass it along to my teammates.. i don't want them to be so disillusioned that they lose interest in attending any future natls. thanks
Parents
  • What is unfair about dividing the total number of points scored by a team by the number of swimmers that actually attended the meet on that team? For example if WCM had 40 swimmers entered and only 35 swam and those 35 scored 600 pts... divide 600 by 35... That way you have an actual TEAM score. So even if a swimmer didn't actually score a point they would be part of the formulation. It just seems to me the most cut and dry formula. That way there is not an advantage to any team no matter how many hundred they bring!!!! It would be about the quality of the swims.
Reply
  • What is unfair about dividing the total number of points scored by a team by the number of swimmers that actually attended the meet on that team? For example if WCM had 40 swimmers entered and only 35 swam and those 35 scored 600 pts... divide 600 by 35... That way you have an actual TEAM score. So even if a swimmer didn't actually score a point they would be part of the formulation. It just seems to me the most cut and dry formula. That way there is not an advantage to any team no matter how many hundred they bring!!!! It would be about the quality of the swims.
Children
No Data