Has the Championship Committee, or other entity within USMS ever discussed having a more strict policy of enforcement in regards to the NQT's?
Why do we state that you must have 3 cuts, in order to swim more events? Why not require a swimmer to have 6 cuts in order to swim 6 events?
Just like to understand more from a historical point of view. I have read post that asked, or suggested how to control the size and length of the National meets. Would not having a stricter enforcement of this policy help? Or would it cause swimmers to shy away from these meets?
Just a curious thought.
Thank you.
CJ,
Just a bit of background info, the suggestion that Nationals should be limited to those who can make an NQT touched off what has been the most controversial forum discussion topic in the history of this website. To outline the pros and cons:
Pros: it's an effective way to keep Nationals from getting out of control and ensuring optimal conditions for competition. It limits "National Championships" to those who have a legitimate shot at being National Champions. It's widely used and everyone already understands it.
Cons: U.S. Masters was originally founded as an inclusive sport where everyone was encouraged to participate regardless of ability; this would be contrary to that value. The goals and the participation of slower swimmers are just as worthy as those of faster swimmers. It is not yet necessary; Nationals are still managable with proper organization.
I'm not sure we want to go there.
Matt
CJ,
Just a bit of background info, the suggestion that Nationals should be limited to those who can make an NQT touched off what has been the most controversial forum discussion topic in the history of this website. To outline the pros and cons:
Pros: it's an effective way to keep Nationals from getting out of control and ensuring optimal conditions for competition. It limits "National Championships" to those who have a legitimate shot at being National Champions. It's widely used and everyone already understands it.
Cons: U.S. Masters was originally founded as an inclusive sport where everyone was encouraged to participate regardless of ability; this would be contrary to that value. The goals and the participation of slower swimmers are just as worthy as those of faster swimmers. It is not yet necessary; Nationals are still managable with proper organization.
I'm not sure we want to go there.
Matt
