Doubling-Up Lanes at Canadian Nationals in Distance Events??

Former Member
Former Member
I entered Canadian Masters Nationals planning to re-taper and re-shave on the heels of U.S. Nationals. In reading the fine print in the meet materials, I discovered a reference to the possibility that they may double up lanes in the distance events. Assuming that they would never actually do this, but needing confirmation before committing to another ~10 day taper, I e-mailed the meet organizers and asked them to confirm that there would be only one swimmer per lane in competition. I received a response from a very helpful and friendly meet official, who said that they would know about doubling up soon, but that I shouldn't worry because they've done it in the past and it "works well". I responded by urging the meet organizers to abandon the notion of doubling up lanes, contending that it significantly compromises the quality of the competition for the sake of moderate time savings (they have 20 racing lanes available). From my perspective, doubling up lanes in distance events "works well" only for those whose sole concern is to get the distance events over with as quickly as possible. In any event, I don't want to pester the meet organizers any further (particularly as a no-big-deal swimmer), but I do have a few follow-up questions that I figured someone here can answer. The threat of the doubling up was enough to convince me to cancel my taper and shave (just not worth it), but now I'm trying to decide whether to swim the 1500 at all. First, if you've seen this done before, how does the race start? Is it a staggered start? Blocks at opposite ends? One off the blocks and the other in the water? Second, do they use the electronic timing system when they do this, or just watch times? Third, does it even comply with USMS rules? Would appreciate thoughts if you've witnessed this.
  • I have done this at a USMS Nationals and FINA Masters World (many years ago) and hate doubling up. The count frequently gets messed up. I think it is pretty much impossible to use electronic timing at least not with touch pads (perhaps it could be touch with buttons and two separate timing systems). However, doubling up is allowed in USMS rules (102.10.4). Starting procedure according to USMS rules has odd heat start off blocks and then even heat starts off blocks. Swimmers split the lane staying to one side (no circle swimming). Separate timing is required for each swimmer.
  • they've done it with kids meets here, where each heat starts at opposite ends of the pool, and the swimmers stay to one side, essentially splitting the lane. I've been told it works well, and timing isn't an issue.
  • they've done it with kids meets here, where each heat starts at opposite ends of the pool, and the swimmers stay to one side, essentially splitting the lane. I've been told it works well, and timing isn't an issue.This is probably from a long course meet, where they are doing chase starts for the other events. Canadian Nationals are SCM’s and it is unlikely that they will have active pads attached to a timing console on both ends for SCM; especially given that they are running 20 lanes. Regardless, based on the number of entrants in the distance events, I’d wager they will be running only 1 per lane for the distance events.
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 9 years ago
    Thanks for your reply, Mary. Staggered start - fascinating. Glad I was planning to be in Montreal next weekend anyway!
  • ah yes, I was assuming Canadian Nats were long course.
  • I watched the 800 free at Pan Ams in Rio (LCM) where they swam two to a lane. There were a number of collisions and near-misses. I wouldn't trust myself not to space out and go to the wrong side of the lane. I think it would take so much energy to focus on being on the correct side of the lane that it would affect the outcome for me. Also as a sort of smallish person, I'd probably get moved around if sharing a lane with a larger swimmer. Maybe this is why I rarely swim distance races!
  • I've done it several times and I don't think it's a big deal or impacts your race much. Actually the last time I did it was at a USA Swimming meet and the other person in my lane was a teenager whose coach told my coach "tell your swimmer to be alert because my swimmer has a tendency to space!" Luckily he didn't and stayed on his own side of the lane. :) The bottom line is obviously one per lane is preferred, but I certainly wouldn't nix a meet just based on the chance they might decide to double up.