Swimsuits Not Lawsuits: We're focused on our mission and members

We’ve always believed that swimming has the power to change lives. That belief fuels our mission to empower adults to improve their lives through swimming.

But in recent weeks, USMS has come under scrutiny from politicians, state officials, and other outside organizations over competition eligibility policies. They don’t understand who we are and what we do. And we need your help setting the record straight as part of our newly launched #SwimsuitsNotLawsuits campaign.

The Background

This situation began with rumors about one member’s performance at our Spring Nationals in April in San Antonio. An external organization fueled online speculation about this swimmer’s eligibility, which led to protests from fellow members and an investigation by the Attorney General in Texas.

After hearing from members, discussions with the Texas Office of the Attorney General, and other external stakeholders, we adopted an interim eligibility policy. The policy clarifies participation and recognition criteria in a way that reflects our mission, our values, and operational considerations specific to Masters Swimming.

Even after announcing the changes, the Florida Attorney General is asking us to further restrict eligibility. And despite everything we did, we still got sued by the Texas Attorney General.

Here’s How You Can Help

  • Read the facts below. We address some of the speculation and inaccuracies here but also encourage you to read the interim eligibility policy and the FAQs page to get the facts.
  • Share correct information when you see or hear inaccurate statements. Please help us by providing facts in response, whether it’s on social media, at the pool, or in your local community. Your voice matters.
  • Let others know what’s great about our organization. In the coming days, we’ll post on social media to address speculation and misleading statements. We’d like you to share those and/or comment how USMS has positively impacted your life, whether you learned to swim through an adult learn-to-swim program, you enjoy swimming every day with a special group of lanemates, or you achieved your goal at an event. Tag us in your own social media posts and use the hashtag #SwimsuitsNotLawsuits. Help others see what makes USMS great: you.

Here Are the Facts That We Need Your Help Clearing Up

  • Our organization is only for adults — not kids. Every one of you is 18 or older, and our policies don’t affect youth or scholastic competitions. 
  • Men and women swim together every day — and it’s not unsafe. Across the country every day, men and women complete workouts in the same lanes as each other, and Masters events are often held with heats that mix men and women with their results tabulated by categories and age groups after the event is completed. This is similar to local 5K runs, cycling races, triathlons, and other adult recreational events. It’s commonplace and safe.
  • Our policy addresses concerns about fair competition. Under our interim eligibility policy, trans women are not eligible to receive competitive recognition in the female category but are allowed to participate. Everyone gets to swim. (Anyone who chooses to swim in the male competition category is eligible for recognition regardless of their sex assigned at birth or gender identity.)
  • Locker room access is not part of our policy — we obey the law and facility policies. Our interim eligibility policy has absolutely nothing to do with locker room or bathroom access. USMS expects all facility rules and applicable local, state, and federal laws regarding access to locker rooms and bathrooms to be followed.
  • Our organization has no political or social agenda — we are mission focused. We are a private nonprofit recreational swimming organization with a focus on adult fitness. We welcome all adults to take advantage of the mental and physical health benefits of swimming through workouts, events, learn-to-swim programs, and social interaction with other swimmers.
  • Self-certification of sex assigned at birth is the most accurate and cost-effective method for our organization. We use the same standard for verification of age and gender as local running races and pickleball leagues. We don’t want to require our members to submit to invasive medical testing just to be able to compete. 

We understand that the topic of transgender competition in women’s sports evokes strong emotions and differing opinions. No policy on transgender eligibility will satisfy everyone, but ours was created to allow us to continue to pursue our mission, satisfy rapidly changing state and federal guidelines, limit the impact to as few members as possible, and save the organization’s resources, which are designed to support our members’ swimming needs, not sustained legal or political theater. 

We didn’t pick this fight, but we will take it head on and continue to strive to be a welcoming organization. We want you to keep swimming and enjoying all the benefits of your USMS membership and ask that you help us correct the mischaracterizations about our organization.

#SwimsuitsNotLawsuits

Sincerely,

Dawson Hughes, CEO, U.S. Masters Swimming
Ed Coates, President, U.S. Masters Swimming

(Posted July 29, 2025)

  • Dawson,

    Credibility is the issue here. Before USMS asks us push a message of "why are you picking on us" I suggest our professional and lay leadership take a hard look in the mirror with our CEO setting the example.

    Let's talk about my experience with USMS, you and inclusion.

    These emails are actually divisive, A great first step should be the USMS dropping immediately our "Diversity and Inclusion" platform.

    In 2023 USMS purposely scheduled the Open Water Championships on Rosh Hashanah then when I called you on it you blew me off. How could I forget when the USMS board President emailed me telling me he spoke to his Jewish neighbor who told him it was ok. Please don't do that again, it was embarrassing.

    You pretended that "Oops we didn't know" except it ended I learned from people involved in USMS that you knew all along of the conflict but you had a sweet deal with Mission Viejo and it's Mayor for that weekend and you hoped nobody would notice. I wouldn't call that inclusion would you?

    These Diversity platforms, including USMS, have a habit of excluding Jews, I took the time to speak with folks involved. It's bad, look no further than at USA Swimming, they have a DEI Director who has openly called for the genocide of Jews on his social media accounts. When it was brought to the attention of USA Swimming's CEO and Counsel, well now their DEI director just made his public accounts private.

    USMS is in the Swim business not the social justice business. It is the responsibility of each club to attract membership and smart ones understand that appealing to a diverse cross section of their communities is good business. That should be it. I know of no benefit from being any one gender, race, belief, ethnicity or people that will help a swimmer complete a 200 fly Long Course, do you?

    I can't wait til Seattle, I'm wondering if we will see tshirts being worn by folks competing, working and attending the meet calling for the eradication and genocide of Jews given the current climate in the US. Have you considered what you are going to do if this happens? Are Jews going to be "safe" at Summer Nationals? Will USMS inclusion include Jews? Your current D&I platform doesn't. 

    To be clear, calling for genocide is not freedom of speech, it is incitement.

    I have worked for decades in the Jewish community fighting hatred. Full disclosure Texas wants my opinion on antisemitism in USMS, what am I going to tell them?

    Btw I speak for myself and my nearly fifty years experience fighting antisemitism.

    We have a beautiful thing here and I am tremendously grateful. Try not to screw it up. So far you have failed us.

    Respectfully,

    Zaq Harrison 

    USMS member 

  • Riddle me this, Dawson —

    Why should USMS members lift a finger to support your #SwimsuitsNotLawsuits campaign when you haven’t even responded to the formal protest submitted after Spring Nationals nearly four months ago?

    You say you "heard from members" and crafted this policy based on "values" and "feedback" — yet the only thing we received was an automated acknowledgment. No answers. No accountability. No explanation for how a man was allowed to compete in the women’s category in April.

    Now you want us to be your PR team — correcting “misinformation,” sharing posts, defending a vague and inconsistent policy — while you’ve stayed silent on the one issue that actually mattered to women competitors?

    Before you ask us to speak for you, maybe try speaking to us.

    We’ve been waiting.

  • "Locker room access is not part of our policy".  That's very sad; not sure how you were brought up.  It's part of my policy, and I suspect it might be part of 99% of your membership's policy.  If a real man sees a mentally-ill man entering into a women's locker room, he will defend the honor of those women with his life, and remove the mentally-ill man.  Sincerely, Bill

  • Hey Angie- Hannah won faily, she is a women, born female, give it up and educate yourself about human biology before you open your mouth again. You and Wendy did this and the only people that should recieve an apology are the ones that you and Wendy slandered publicly. Grow up and leave USMS, we were doing just fine until your hate campaign went viral. Shame on you, take some responsibility for a change. This organization wouldn't be spinning their wheels if they didnt have to clean up the mess that you and Wendy created.

  • Leann,

    Would love to know when the USMS "Diversity and Inclusion" committee will be truly inclusive and consider Jews as a minority, still trying to understand why your committee and USMS ignore our community. Y'all really had our backs when the '23 Open Water Nationals were scheduled on Rosh Hashanah. You guys knew and did it anyway.

    If you want to call out others for not being open and inclusive might be a good idea to consider how you treat others first.

    Seems like "inclusion" is quite selective.

    Zaq Harrison 

  • Dawson & Ed -

    Will we ever get a response on athlete Ana Caldas from San Antonio? It has been 4 months. You have also completed the Federal Way meet so it’s high time for a response. We recieved a response on Jennifer Rhines immediately. Why so quiet on Ana Caldas? 

    The interim policy you have pushed out is not an answer to the eligibility question. You all respond to nothing on this? Why?

    Cissy Cochran 

  • What was the result of Rhines' eligibility review? 

  • In some states, you would be committing a crime.  It seems the most sensible thing for the organization is to admit that it doesn't control locker rooms. Follow the law where you are.  

  • I'd be okay with somewhat revising the DEI statement, which wasn't that bad to begin with. In general, I'm in favor of a reasonable degree of sensitivity to everyone.  

    However, the policy regarding transgender people seems reasonable.  As to self-certification, do you want to pay extra dues so that people will be tested to ensure they are what they say?  I don't.  

    I too am a Jew.  For every two Jews, you'll have three opinions.  It's a good things to avoid setting swimming events on Jewish holidays.  However, I question what that has to do with this issue.  

    We each have our social and political beliefs.  Exercise them.  Masters swimming should try to stick to swimming as much as possible.