Bodysuits and masters swimming

Former Member
Former Member
The following has appeared on a swim forum in the UK _______________________________________________ I’ve been looking at recent masters results. It’s clear that swimmers are producing much slower times without bodysuits. Furthermore, many swimmers are disillusioned and are on the verge of giving up completely. It would be a travesty if these swimmers (they are mostly the over 45s) were lost to the sport altogether. The majority of masters swimmers prefer to compete in bodysuits. Of that there is no doubt, as witnessed at masters meets up and down the country. It is a disgrace that masters swimmers have been included in the ‘new rules’ concerning elite swimming. I find it quite sad that many swimmers are talking about cutting up their suits, taking out zips and even asking whether they are allowed ‘modesty panels’ in their suits any more. As always, we are getting no advice, guidance or even leadership from the toothless Masters Committee, whose gingivitic and malocclusive tendencies are attracting Big Nev’s interest, but that’s to be expected. But it doesn’t have to be like this. Masters swimmers in Italy are not accepting this farce. They are still holding meets where swimmers can choose to wear bodysuits. There was a recent questionnaire sent out to 4,000 masters swimmers in France. 2,700 swimmers replied, stating they wished to keep their bodysuits for competition. Masters swimmers in Germany are on the verge of revolution! They accept that masters swimmers are not going to be a threat to any Olympian’s records. Many have now entered masters meets in Italy where they can wear their suits if they want. Also, some meet organisers in Germany are holding similar meets. Instead of following any directive from our anaemic and tedious Masters Committee, I’d like to see masters swimmers in the UK make a stand against the stupidity surrounding the banning of bodysuits. It will cost me time and money but I’m prepared to organise this. We need meet organisers in the UK to hold ‘optional suit’ masters meets. Swimmers can choose whether to wear a suit or not. If they are going for a record then the suitless option is a must - but only for a while. I believe that if we boycott masters meets where suits are now allowed, meet organisers, the Masters Committee and the ASA would have to take notice. At the moment they don’t give a toss. At the forefront of the ASA’s mind would be the loss of revenue. Believe me, they see masters swimming as a joke anyway, they would happily let masters swim in bodysuits if it meant they could keep the revenue pouring in. Getting meet organisers to run ‘bodysuit’ meets would be easy. They would be oversubscribed, every time. Not only from our swimmers but from overseas entries too. I can see one-day meets turning into weekend ones. The organisers could make a lot of money from these well-attended meets. Pulling the plug on masters meets because of low entries would be a thing of the past. These meets would be the thin end of the wedge in bringing about a change of rules. It‘s the boycotting of ‘non-suit’ meets that would bring a change of rule overnight. The decathlon would be meaningless because ‘suited’ swims wouldn’t count towards it - but in reality, it is a meaningless competition anyway for all but ten swimmers in the UK who have a chance of winning it. Don’t underestimate what can be done. Masters swimmers are a powerful group in swimming. The Government is putting very large amounts of money into the greasy hand of the ASA to promote health and fitness for adults. The ASA wouldn’t like the kind of publicity we can give them. If you feel you can support this initiative I’ll make a start. Masters swimmers in Italy, France and Germany are ready to come on board. Many masters swimmers in America are also willing to make a stand against their governing body. Naturally, support from suit manufacturers is there already. I’ve spoken to four of the biggest.
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    I'm sorry, but I can't let this go. Even though the wookster and I are ex-pals (temporarly I hope) I must protest. It is unfair for you to call wook and Bill pinheads. Well, Bill I understand, but not my ex-pal. He is everything but a pinhead. If you continue this bashing of my ex-pal I'll consult with an out of work lawyer. That should straighten you out. You are the third pinhead that was being referenced.
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Puh-leeeze. It's Mrs. Duggan. (Geek and Wookie- you are many things, pinhead isn't one of them) Mrs. Duggan, if I go to nationals, I would be honored to by you a drink(I would actually get the bill put onto Geek's bill though)
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    You are the third pinhead that was being referenced. WHAT? Hold on. My friend sold me a cool helmet that allows me to go back and check posts out from the past. It is kind of like a time machine only different. I'll see if I can buy you one. I think they come in super-extra-smalls. Don't worry about the cost, I'll just put it on your bill. I'll be right back. I'm going back in time. OK, I'm back. Holy smokes wook, you're right again, I think she was refering to me. Man, what a true pal you turned out to be, I would have gone on forever (unless I wore the helmet) thinking Ms. Duggan thought you and Bill were pinheads. Thanks pal
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Puh-leeeze. It's Mrs. Duggan. I am so sorry I dropped an r. Rs are very important in our beautiful language. I couldn't suvive without an r. I can feel your angst. The simple please would never convey the anguish I caused you. Thank goodness you didn't need to resort to five eees, as I would have been really ashamed at my mistake. I am sorry. But really Mrs. Duggan, isn't there a different reason for your hurt? It's the book isn't it. I have journied long and hard these past few seconds (time travel) and found a solution that I think you will like: Chapter II, When the talking donkey(or monkey, if you prefer) and his buddy come down from the mountain after a really cold night filled with cowboy antics, they find a beautiful maiden. (that would be you, Mrs. Duggan) I can't tell you the rest due to fear of intellectual theft. So, Mrs. Duggan I have included you in wook's and my book. Your sorrow should be lifted and you should have a song in your heart.
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Mrs. Duggan, if I go to nationals, I would be honored to by you a drink Wook, great idea (how many times can I say that?). Submit the claim. We'll take it from the advances. Your pal
  • I wasn't calling them pinheads. Guess I used the plural too liberally. :lmao: Anybody heard from Mr. Moose lately?
  • Stillwater, you crack me up. :D I think it's spelled "journeyed".
  • Yee-haw, and perhaps it's time to ride off into the sunset.
  • I meant ME riding off into the sunset. Sheesh.
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    I think it's spelled "journeyed". Mrs. Duggan, That is why I need the wookster. I feel like the little boy chasing Alan Ladd on horseback shouting, "Shane, come back, Shane, come back." Like Shane, wook will return also. The good cowboys always do.