No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?
Former Member
If you discount the Jaked and X-Glide records, you also have to discount the LZR records, even Phelps swimming only in the legskin. So who is actually swimming "faster" than any 2007 records ?
The British Backstroker Spofforth swam more than a second faster than Coughlin wearing an LZR - she is close.
Steffen did a WR last year in the addidas suit + is more than a second faster than her own 2006 time - but it would be close.
Phelps maybe in the 200 Free - he dropped less than a second last year, but the LZR has dropped a lot more time for most swimmers - so I would say no.
For sure a very very short list ....
Former Member
Agreed, it will take YEARS, maybe even decades (like Mary T's or Janet Evans') for some of these to get broken.
The Men's 200/400/(1500?) Frees come to mind. I think the men's records set in leggings only might go down by 2012.
Yeah - I messed up on the 100 Free records -
USA swimming has a nice database for record progression -
www.usaswimming.org/.../DesktopDefault.aspx
Even so - there have been Olympic cycles without a lot of records. If you account for some of the rule changes and the evolution of the SDKs --- but then again - there will be new things to improve upon.
I go back to the sub 21 though - I just can't see anybody even close to that for decades in a regular suit.
Case in point Atlanta saw very few records. Both *** records to Heyns, the 100 to Deburghraeve, and a couple relays. That was it.
The mid 90s didn't see many records go.
Case in point Atlanta saw very few records. Both *** records to Heyns, the 100 to Deburghraeve, and a couple relays. That was it.
The mid 90s didn't see many records go.
I remember seeing some statistical analysis to the effect that Atlanta was improbably low, just as Beijing was abnormally high. I think that neither is a good guideline as to the number of records we could have expected, sans LZR.