I did a search on hypertension on this site so it seems like I'm am not alone here and there is quite a resource to draw from. So perhaps I can get some idea what I am looking at with my situation.
I'm only 34, started swimming again nearly a year ago. Partly because I new I had high blood pressure, but mostly I started swimming for overall health and fitness benifits. Since then I have lost roughly 30 pounds. At 6'2" I now weigh about 200 pounds. I would expect that all this work would have some impact on my blood pressure. Especially since I rarely drink, and my diet isn't terrible. I generally eat healthy meals. But the sad truth is that it hasn't changed. Nearly a year ago my BP was 140 over 100. This week... The same. Absolutely no change!!! As a result, my doctor put me on Lisinopril, an ACE inhibitor. So naturally I concerned about a few things.
1. Does this mean I will be taking BP medication for the rest of my life?
2. How will this impact my swimming/ability to train? is there a better medication that I should ask about so there are not adverse effects?
3. Do I need to start taking things easier in the pool?
4. Since I have a family history of hypertension does this mean there is really nothing I can do aside from medication?
5. Anything else I need to be concerned about?
Thanks in advance for any advice or helpful comments.
Kevin
Been on Lipitor for over 5 years & no problems training & swimming . was 140/85 now 125/75 .
Consider yourself lucky and very fortunate, for the only problem with Lipitor (for some of us) is that you have to always fight the insurance companies that want you to take some non-evidence based (generic) drug instead.
Exercise drops your blood pressure. Your sugar also levels out with exercise. Proper intake of food also levels out your sugar if you are diabetic. My sugar fluctuates between 5 and 7, my readings for BP 123 over 72. I work out but do not over do it. My goal is not to race but be fit. My weight today 250lbs I am 6' 2 and 3/4".
About three years or so I was in the same situation and posted a message on this board. You may have even read it in your research. Whenever at the doctor's, my BP was elevated and I was told to get it checked out. I was not/am not overweight, don't smoke/drink, always exercise regularly, and had a reasonable diet. There was not much else to do that could bring the BP down since it seemed that lifestyle was not the culprit.
Then our LMSC had an article in the newsletter about an athlete runner in his 30's that had a stroke. He had elevated BP but never did anything about it, believing the athletic exercise and diet would take care of it. Wake up call.
I spoke with my doctor about my swimming needs and lifestyle, and was prescribed Lisinopril, 5mg daily, cost about $7 per month. It's been around for a long time, so it is well known. There are some known side effects possible in a few people, but they are not serious and I don't have any. About three years later, I am still on this and it keeps my BP acceptable. My experience is that it has not affected my swimming or training.
I hoped that someday I could stop taking the medication, but am realistic enough to know that for me as for most people, it's not likely. (I also hope that someday I drink beer as much as I want and break Masters world records.)
Are you a gambler?
See Monday's Wall Street Journal:
online.wsj.com/.../SB10001424052748704350304574638331243027174.html
Regular exercise has been shown to combat the ongoing damage done to cells, tissues and organs that underlies many chronic conditions. Indeed, studies have found that exercise can lower blood pressure, reduce bad cholesterol, and cut the incidence of Type 2 diabetes.
In a study published in November in Circulation, the medical journal of the American Heart Association, German researchers compared two groups of professional athletes (32 of whom were in their early 20s, and 25 who were middle-aged) with two groups (26 young and 21 middle-aged) who were healthy nonsmokers, but not regular exercisers. The athletes had significantly less erosion in telomeres than their more sedentary counterparts. The study concluded that physical activity has an anti-aging effect at the cellular level, suggesting exercise could prevent aging of the cardiovascular system.
Also:
online.wsj.com/.../SB10001424052748704350304574638550059084962.html
Dr. Williams' studies have shown that exceeding the federally recommended exercise guidelines can reduce the risk of stroke, heart attack, glaucoma, diabetes and other diseases by as much as 70% above the benefits of merely meeting the guidelines. "There is no gene or drug discovery that comes close" to the effects of more and more-vigorous exercise, says Dr. Williams, a staff scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley Calif.
Official exercise guidelines—emanating from groups like the American Heart Association as well as the federal government—typically call for half an hour a day of exercise, including a portion at moderate to high levels of intensity. At 3.5 hours per week, most walkers and even runners would cover fewer than 20 miles.
By contrast, Dr. Williams's research has found progressively greater health benefits for runners topping 30, 40, even 49 miles a week. Dr. Williams assumes—as do his critics—that similar effects would be gained from increased workloads among swimmers, cyclists and other aerobic athletes.
Oh, so that's what ISH stands for!
I'm the opposite. Am usually about 110/50 and prone to passing out if I stand up too quickly.
Low blood pressure, when it occurs, is usually a female problem. I think it's the females that give us the high bp..haha.
Originally Posted by joshua forums.usms.org/.../viewpost.gif
Low blood pressure, when it occurs, is usually a female problem. I think it's the females that give us the high bp..haha.
"Interesting point. Not to be too risque here, but I did an article on impotence once, and I was surprised to find that high blood pressure in males, at least over the short term, leads to harder erections. (Over the long run, of course, it hurts blood vessels and can contribute to impotence.) As the medical literature has convincingly proven, as evidenced by no shortage of Internet products, females clearly prefer erections with the rigidity of "cold blue steel."
I don't think that it is at all paranoid to suggest that women, in hopes of short-term thrills for themselves, are inducing high blood pressure in men. Absolute selfishness on their part, if you ask me. Particularly when they do this in guys like me and have no intention whatsoever to have sex anyhow."
Caught in the act :blush:
I don't know if ISH is treated differently from mo
re normal high blood pressure (where both numbers are elevated.)
Thanks in advance for any help you might provide.
forums.usms.org/blog.php
Of course you really need to have a thoughtful internist who knows you to put this into perspective...
I was always taught to worry more when then diatstolic is elevated on a chronic basis than when the systolic is elevated alone. Systolic elevation by itself can be from pain or stress. As a kid (14 yrs) I had elevated systolic BPs (although labile) with relatively low diastolics. My BP was often 140/ 70. I had a big workup at Boston Children's and then the nephrologist told me "you swimmers often have this.." I don't know what that meant, if anything. I am not sure if anyone still believes its true, but it was reassuring at the time and my blood pressure didn't become and issue again for about 25 years.
Are you taking your BP yourself? Or are you in a nervous situation when its being measured? If you are using a home cuff check it against a professional's to be sure its calibrated, have someone else take it for you, try to relax when it is being taken and don't look at the machine when they are doing it.
As far as anti-hypertensives...again you have to talk to your own doctor about what's best for you. There are some good reviews about athletes with hypertension which you can peruse or share with your physician. Personally I like the ACE inhibitors (like lisinopril) they work well, are available generic and don't appear to limit athletic performance. YMMV (as they say).
Disclaimers: This is my opinion and should not be taken as specific medical advice. I am not an expert in adults with hypertension, I am a pediatric pulmonologist. I am also a middle aged man who began swimming again, recently, after 25 years "away" in an effort to treat his own hypertension, obesity and mood lability -- so I've thought about these issues some in recent months.
Low blood pressure, when it occurs, is usually a female problem. I think it's the females that give us the high bp..haha.
Interesting point. Not to be too risque here, but I did an article on impotence once, and I was surprised to find that high blood pressure in males, at least over the short term, leads to harder erections. (Over the long run, of course, it hurts blood vessels and can contribute to impotence.) As the medical literature has convincingly proven, as evidenced by no shortage of Internet products, females clearly prefer erections with the rigidity of "cold blue steel."
I don't think that it is at all paranoid to suggest that women, in hopes of short-term thrills for themselves, are inducing high blood pressure in men. Absolute selfishness on their part, if you ask me. Particularly when they do this in guys like me and have no intention whatsoever to have sex anyhow.
Low blood pressure can be a sign of thyroid problems. My 18 year old's thyroid problem was discovered by by a couple lbp readings.
Perhaps she and I could somehow help each other balance things out?
Of course you really need to have a thoughtful internist who knows you to put this into perspective...
I was always taught to worry more when then diatstolic is elevated on a chronic basis than when the systolic is elevated alone. Systolic elevation by itself can be from pain or stress. As a kid (14 yrs) I had elevated systolic BPs (although labile) with relatively low diastolics. My BP was often 140/ 70. I had a big workup at Boston Children's and then the nephrologist told me "you swimmers often have this.." I don't know what that meant, if anything. I am not sure if anyone still believes its true, but it was reassuring at the time and my blood pressure didn't become and issue again for about 25 years.
Are you taking your BP yourself? Or are you in a nervous situation when its being measured? If you are using a home cuff check it against a professional's to be sure its calibrated, have someone else take it for you, try to relax when it is being taken and don't look at the machine when they are doing it.
As far as anti-hypertensives...again you have to talk to your own doctor about what's best for you. There are some good reviews about athletes with hypertension which you can peruse or share with your physician. Personally I like the ACE inhibitors (like lisinopril) they work well, are available generic and don't appear to limit athletic performance. YMMV (as they say).
Disclaimers: This is my opinion and should not be taken as specific medical advice. I am not an expert in adults with hypertension, I am a pediatric pulmonologist. I am also a middle aged man who began swimming again, recently, after 25 years "away" in an effort to treat his own hypertension, obesity and mood lability -- so I've thought about these issues some in recent months.
Thanks Pendaluft! Joking aside, I think one of my first fears (after exploding head--again, I refer you to my short film at forums.usms.org/blog.php
-- fast forward to the end, and you won't have to listen to my pointless blather) --was the thought that any medication I might have to take would reduce my swimming abilities.
There are a bunch of studies now on ISH in older Americans. A summary for us laymen, courtesy of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, can be found here: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/.../whathbp.htm
For what it's worth, I am no stranger to various physiological anomalies that may be related to swimming. For example, I have first degree AV heart block, which sounded terrible when the doctor told me, but much less so when he explained that it's not uncommon in people who train a lot and get a lower resting heart rate as a result (the interval between beats has to elongate somewhere, he said, and this is one way the well-exercised heart does it.)
I have also been diagnosed with mild anemia for almost a decade now, with no apparent ill effect. One explanation that made sense to me, and I am sticking with so as to not worry about it, is that I may have sports anemia--a pseudo anemia caused by increased plasma volume from regular endurance exercise, thus diluting the RBC count, etc.
Could my ISH (like your boyhood version of it) have anything to do with swimming? Is it possible it's not actually a bad thing, but rather the effect of swimming regularly over the decades? Am I worrying for naught?
I suppose it's possible. It would be great if this were the case.
I wonder if treatment norms are based on average Americans, the vast majority of which are pretty sedentary at age 57.
So far, I haven't gotten any treatment for my anemia, and I sometimes wonder if this would do me more harm than good, especially if it really is the dilutional "sports" variety. If my ISH remains unchanged, I will ask my doctor's advice, and probably do what he says (if I can afford it.)
If so, I will definitely bring up the lisopronil endorsement. Thanks again!
And best of luck with your return to swimming. Quite possibly, the best one-stop apothecary available!
Note: you mentioned mood lability. If you get Swimmer, check out my article on swimming's effect on mood in the current issue. You (and anybody else who is interested) can also email me at Jamesthornton1@comcast.net and I'll send you .pdf copies of this story plus a recent story I wrote for Men's Health on the multitudinous benefits of masters swimming.