Today, I swam the 200 yards free in 2:09.11.
This beats my previous best of 2:09.54 from April 1994.
I challenged the 2:09.54 in the past 11 years, over 20 times, many times under what I learned the hard way to be the wrong preparation, and never came close.
My result will be posted officially in the USMS databse.
I won't be able to make the 2005 Short Course Nationals, but hopefully I will make the 2005 Long Course Nationals.
The reason that I bring this success here is that there are some lessons to learn from it:
1.) to pursue virtue and excellence by meeting the intrinsic requirements that come to having a worthwhile goal (in my case, the goal is to stay in my prime intellectually and physically, for longtime), that's intelligence and tenacious work;
I immigrated to U.S. and relocated within U.S. on job skills in science to live my lifestyle;
this lifestyle comprises now, over 39 weeks of the 2004-2005 season so far, of 1,093 kilometers of training (an average of 28.025 kilometers per week, or 30,828 yards per week, no matter the holidays, tapering or illness, that includes kicking, strokes, and technique quotas), the most mileage I slowly built my late starter physiology up to in life, mostly under a Masters club with primarly college and age group swimming expertise, which I searched for and choosed;
I also cross train consistently in weights and running;
2.) I scrutinize self-indulgence and greed (to an employer who was asking me to work overtime like his Japanese employees do, even though I was ahead in schedule in a project, and who thought that I am a slave to him giving me a work visa, I stated "You know, my life doesn't depend on you." and I walked away from a near six-figures salary because it was jeopardizing my swim training; I looked for and found another) and I scrutinize good intentions backed up by feelings without hard data.
2:09.11 and staying in my prime, that's a tribute to 1.) and 2.).
Former Member
Ion wrote: "
Excuses...Last year you did 2:57.77 and me 2:11.10, light years between us, two late bloomers training differently.
Now I did 2:09.11."
Gee Ion, I didn't think Connie was a men USMS Swimmer.....
Why put your time up against her time? I am lost!
Former Member
Originally posted by Tom Ellison
...
Gee Ion, I didn't think Connie was a men USMS Swimmer.....
...
I didn't think that either.
You got confused.
Former Member
Originally posted by Ion Beza
The study that I read says that it's age specific.
The quality of the alteration is different at 28 than at 15.
Right--I was editing my post while you were responding. The conversion may not be possible after development is complete. Keep in mind that genes play a major role as well. Also, we all (early and late bloomers alike) lose muscle mass as we age, but we can slow the process with exercise and weight training.
Former Member
Then why on earth would you put your time up against her time?
I'll answer my own question.....because you need another crutch....(Not to say woman are less...but the facts speak volumes that men are stronger and faster....that is why we have W & M's events)......
You tiger you.....heck, why not put your times up against the 10 & under kids....Ops, be careful there....I know a few 10 and under swimmers that would give you a good race.....
Former Member
Originally posted by gull80
Right--I was editing my post while you were responding. The conversion may not be possible after development is complete. Keep in mind that genes play a major role as well. Also, we lose muscle mass as we age; we can slow the process with exercise and weight training.
(The italics are mine)
Mary,
see?
See?
By a medical doctor.
Former Member
Ion....NO ONE no matter how talented they are and how early they start is going to win an Olympic medal in a 200 free with POOR turns. Even Thorpe and Phelps have to work on their turns regularly.
Former Member
Originally posted by Ion Beza
Your process is different than mine.
Your process addresses weigh loss, 40 pounds.
Duh!
I never claimed it was the same.
Also, let me point out few more details to you:
You're a male, I'm a female.
You upper body musle mass is probably at least 3 times more than mine.
You have some 18 years of swimming, I have barely 2.
You have been previously athletic, I haven't (You're not a true 'late bloomer' anyways).
We're not in the same age group.
There's more, but even just the above will suffice...
You're the one that started comparing yourself to me. In my opinion, your attempt at doing that is rather ludicrous on your part.
Former Member
Mary was questioning your claim that the 10 year old girl is faster because of hormones.
Former Member
Originally posted by aquageek
...
And, just as last year, he has been disproven time and again.
...
But you don't read.
Just like last year when I proved this.
Read Craig's last two posts.
Last year you even didn't know what's VO2Max and Craig explained to you what it is in endurance.
Former Member
Tom Ellison, you're my hero (said just like Cameron Frye) ;)