Today, I swam the 200 yards free in 2:09.11.
This beats my previous best of 2:09.54 from April 1994.
I challenged the 2:09.54 in the past 11 years, over 20 times, many times under what I learned the hard way to be the wrong preparation, and never came close.
My result will be posted officially in the USMS databse.
I won't be able to make the 2005 Short Course Nationals, but hopefully I will make the 2005 Long Course Nationals.
The reason that I bring this success here is that there are some lessons to learn from it:
1.) to pursue virtue and excellence by meeting the intrinsic requirements that come to having a worthwhile goal (in my case, the goal is to stay in my prime intellectually and physically, for longtime), that's intelligence and tenacious work;
I immigrated to U.S. and relocated within U.S. on job skills in science to live my lifestyle;
this lifestyle comprises now, over 39 weeks of the 2004-2005 season so far, of 1,093 kilometers of training (an average of 28.025 kilometers per week, or 30,828 yards per week, no matter the holidays, tapering or illness, that includes kicking, strokes, and technique quotas), the most mileage I slowly built my late starter physiology up to in life, mostly under a Masters club with primarly college and age group swimming expertise, which I searched for and choosed;
I also cross train consistently in weights and running;
2.) I scrutinize self-indulgence and greed (to an employer who was asking me to work overtime like his Japanese employees do, even though I was ahead in schedule in a project, and who thought that I am a slave to him giving me a work visa, I stated "You know, my life doesn't depend on you." and I walked away from a near six-figures salary because it was jeopardizing my swim training; I looked for and found another) and I scrutinize good intentions backed up by feelings without hard data.
2:09.11 and staying in my prime, that's a tribute to 1.) and 2.).
Former Member
Life and swimming do not always boil down to hard data. Some people never grasp that and it makes them very irritating. Life must be very cold and lonely when it is all based on data. Yeah, I know Ion, go ahead and accuse me of posting sentiment. And go ahead and report my post.
Originally posted by laineybug
Life and swimming do not always boil down to hard data.
...
We talked about this 14 months ago.
For non scientists is like you say.
For scientists is like I say.
For the neutral world (newspapers, T.V., USMS statistics, swimming competitions, etc.) is like I say.
Originally posted by laineybug
...
Some people never grasp that and it makes them very irritating. Life must be very cold and lonely when it is all based on data. Yeah, I know Ion, go ahead and accuse me of posting sentiment. And go ahead and report my post.
Keep hoping.
You didn't derail my thread or engaged in personal attacks.
You are discussing.
And that's why we are in this thread.
I was trying to ignore this thread but alas, I've been wooed back ...
Ion, there is no data to back up the exsistence of God or any other higher being, so are the billions and billions of people that believe in him/her/it wrong?
Originally posted by SwiminONandON
...
Ion, there is no data to back up the exsistence of God or any other higher being, so are the billions and billions of people that believe in him/her/it wrong?
God is unrelated to this thread.
Go to www.infidels.org and find that yes, they are wrong.
Just submitting this parallel is a fallacy, it's appeal to popularity, it's not appeal to reason backed up by hard data.
We know how much garbage appeal to popularity does achieve on T.V..
Or how much garbage appeal to popularity did achieve when believing that the earth is flat.
Originally posted by Ion Beza
I remember that, bug.
Soft science.
Psychology.
No mathematics.
LOL, tell that to the numerous folks who left my PhD program because the couldn't pass the math and statistics required. You need to stop looking down you nose at any field that isn't math.
Originally posted by laineybug
...
You need to stop looking down you nose at any field that isn't math.
I will keep looking down at any field that isn't mathematics.
Swimming results that's 100% numbers.