Today, I swam the 200 yards free in 2:09.11.
This beats my previous best of 2:09.54 from April 1994.
I challenged the 2:09.54 in the past 11 years, over 20 times, many times under what I learned the hard way to be the wrong preparation, and never came close.
My result will be posted officially in the USMS databse.
I won't be able to make the 2005 Short Course Nationals, but hopefully I will make the 2005 Long Course Nationals.
The reason that I bring this success here is that there are some lessons to learn from it:
1.) to pursue virtue and excellence by meeting the intrinsic requirements that come to having a worthwhile goal (in my case, the goal is to stay in my prime intellectually and physically, for longtime), that's intelligence and tenacious work;
I immigrated to U.S. and relocated within U.S. on job skills in science to live my lifestyle;
this lifestyle comprises now, over 39 weeks of the 2004-2005 season so far, of 1,093 kilometers of training (an average of 28.025 kilometers per week, or 30,828 yards per week, no matter the holidays, tapering or illness, that includes kicking, strokes, and technique quotas), the most mileage I slowly built my late starter physiology up to in life, mostly under a Masters club with primarly college and age group swimming expertise, which I searched for and choosed;
I also cross train consistently in weights and running;
2.) I scrutinize self-indulgence and greed (to an employer who was asking me to work overtime like his Japanese employees do, even though I was ahead in schedule in a project, and who thought that I am a slave to him giving me a work visa, I stated "You know, my life doesn't depend on you." and I walked away from a near six-figures salary because it was jeopardizing my swim training; I looked for and found another) and I scrutinize good intentions backed up by feelings without hard data.
2:09.11 and staying in my prime, that's a tribute to 1.) and 2.).
Former Member
In my first Masters meet two years ago, I was so confident I'd be under 2:00 that I "conservatively" entered a seed time of 1:53. The other guys in my heat had hit the showers by the time I finished. Sadly, I wasn't even in an outside lane. That had to be the biggest damn piano I'd ever seen.
Former Member
lol ... that's hysterical ... Ande, I actually was responding to Leonard's comment about going Texas Chainsaw Masacre on his family ... but thanks ... going under 2:00 is a goal of mine, but it ain't happening anytime soon ...
Former Member
Going under 2:00 was a goal I set when I started back swimming in 1990. I only did it once in a Zone Championship meet in Dallas in 1997. I went 1:59.67 at 47 years old....and was very happy to have swam under 2:00. What is wild is that placed me 3rd or 4th and the first two were high 40's low 50's.....Very fast company I must say....Heck, I could not go under 2:00 now even if they threw me out the Door of a Boeing 747 in cruise....
Former Member
Ande, I'm talking 200 free, not IM ... not like it wont' take a lot of work, but it's a BIG difference!
Former Member
Ion, that is really cool!Although I did not hit the wall in my times yet, it is harder and harder to improve and when I do, it gives me SUCH SATISFACTION!!!You must be feeling like the happiest man alive now, since you waited for 11 years to break your time again!!!Congrats!
Former Member
Originally posted by hooked-on-swimming
Ion, that is really cool!Although I did not hit the wall in my times yet, it is harder and harder to improve and when I do, it gives me SUCH SATISFACTION!!!You must be feeling like the happiest man alive now, since you waited for 11 years to break your time again!!!Congrats!
Yes.
And we have things in common Dima, I followed silently your progress since you were doing last fall 1:20 in the 100 meters short course and were dismayed in this forum about stagnation, up until now with your 1:03 and wondering about 55 seconds.
Former Member
I would sell my first born to get that close to a 200 time...if I had a first born....;)
One time, I put myself in a paper bag, a big brown one, just to see if I could sprint my way out of it, and I could't - I got stuck in the paper bag.
(to the tune of Gwen Stefani's Rich Girl...)
"If were a fast girl...na na na na na na na na na na na..."
But put me in a 1650 and it's a whole different story, baby!
Congrat, Ion!!!!
I know a pretty good part of why I can't, or at least haven't, approached my personal bests is I'm only training a fraction of the time I did then. Still, I think if I won the lottery, quit my job and spent all my time training it would still be very difficult to get down to those times. I might get close, but at 35 I have doubts I could get all the way back.
Bill,
It's funny to me, actually kind of strange, that people (not you in particular) feel the need to "label" this or that achievement. Or to provide reasons why this or that did or didn't happen.
Naturally, you look at things and try to improve, but to give ones circumstances a general label is... I don't know the word... weird?
It's seems more natural to be like the Nike ad and "Just do it."
My husband and I have joked that we have our life best times and our life best times post having three kids- of course that's just it, we're joking, because we don't feel the need to qualify any of our swims. We know our circumstances and we do the best we can, plain and simple. Our FRIENDS (and I consider you one :) ) also know our circumstances. If it's relevant to something, I'll share, if not I just quietly go about my life :)
My .02 (that's two cents, not two hundredths 'ya swimmer!)