Today, I swam the 200 yards free in 2:09.11.
This beats my previous best of 2:09.54 from April 1994.
I challenged the 2:09.54 in the past 11 years, over 20 times, many times under what I learned the hard way to be the wrong preparation, and never came close.
My result will be posted officially in the USMS databse.
I won't be able to make the 2005 Short Course Nationals, but hopefully I will make the 2005 Long Course Nationals.
The reason that I bring this success here is that there are some lessons to learn from it:
1.) to pursue virtue and excellence by meeting the intrinsic requirements that come to having a worthwhile goal (in my case, the goal is to stay in my prime intellectually and physically, for longtime), that's intelligence and tenacious work;
I immigrated to U.S. and relocated within U.S. on job skills in science to live my lifestyle;
this lifestyle comprises now, over 39 weeks of the 2004-2005 season so far, of 1,093 kilometers of training (an average of 28.025 kilometers per week, or 30,828 yards per week, no matter the holidays, tapering or illness, that includes kicking, strokes, and technique quotas), the most mileage I slowly built my late starter physiology up to in life, mostly under a Masters club with primarly college and age group swimming expertise, which I searched for and choosed;
I also cross train consistently in weights and running;
2.) I scrutinize self-indulgence and greed (to an employer who was asking me to work overtime like his Japanese employees do, even though I was ahead in schedule in a project, and who thought that I am a slave to him giving me a work visa, I stated "You know, my life doesn't depend on you." and I walked away from a near six-figures salary because it was jeopardizing my swim training; I looked for and found another) and I scrutinize good intentions backed up by feelings without hard data.
2:09.11 and staying in my prime, that's a tribute to 1.) and 2.).
Former Member
Originally posted by Tom Ellison
All I'm going to say is this....
"Things that never change....tend to remain the same!"
You mean that you will keep never posting one single swimming datum, Ellison?
Originally posted by Ion Beza
Swimming results that's 100% numbers.
Right. And unfortunately that's why we can't qualify these numbers based on variables like swimming background, aerobic development, etc. When I finish a race and see my time on the scoreboard, it's just a number. It may or may not accurately reflect the amount of time and effort I invested in my training. It's up to me to put that number in perspective.
Originally posted by Ion Beza
I will keep looking down at any field that isn't mathematics.
I rest my case.
Tom, you are right, the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. Yes, Ion, I could if I wanted to research the literature and give you hard data, that comes from well controled experiments, to prove that.
Originally posted by Ion Beza
Manually it was 2:08.77.
I .
Plus, young Kathryn watches and likes me.
Can you convert the "Kathryn effect" into a number or data
we can use?
Ion: I will keep looking down at any field that isn't mathematics. Swimming results that's 100% numbers.
If you want to stay with the numbers being everything....especially in the area of swimming results....
Perhaps you need to get a few more crutches other then being a late bloomer.....Now, this is not an attack...It is just my thoughts put forth in a decent manner and based on your posts.
Originally posted by laineybug
...
Tom, you are right, the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.
...
No need for Ellison here.
You could have said: "Ion, you are right, the best predicator of future behavior is past bevavior."
I am a picture of consistency in goals and means.
Originally posted by laineybug
...
Yes, Ion, I could if I wanted to research the literature and give you hard data, that comes from well controled experiments, to prove that.
In swimming?
That talented people who start swimming at 50, become fast?
Like in 1:49 per 200 free?
No way.
None.
Originally posted by Ion Beza
But I do qualify numbers, Craig.
Read the list that I posted for Lindsay.
It has quotas of numbers that make up my training, my process.
You misunderstood my post. I said "qualify" not "quantify." That's the trouble with numbers--they have no soul.
Originally posted by old dog
Can you convert the "Kathryn effect" into a number or data
we can use?
Yes.
The Kathryn effect on my time is zero.
I am me, with my swimming numbers, with or without Kathryn.
Kathryn is a plus outside my swimming numbers.