Swimming Finals at the World Championships in Barcelona, Spain

Former Member
Former Member
The finals of the first day, show: .) in the men 400 meter free final, Thorpe (Aus.) went 3:42.58 for #1, Hackett (Aus.) went 3:45.17 for #2, and Coman (Rom.) went 3:46.8x for #3; Coman -who is my fellow countryman, and I was telling you about him for years-, defeated Rossolini (Ita.) of the 2000 Olympics fame, Keller (U.S.) and Carvin (U.S.); .) in the women 400 meter free final, Simona Paduraru (Rom.) finished #7, with a fast time; .) in the 4x100 men free relay, Russia won; the fastest split was by Frenchman Frederic Bousquet at 47.03 -which is the second fastest split in history-, and fast splits (in the 47s) were recorded by Alex. Popov (Rus.) and Jason Lezak (U.S.); .) in the 4x100 women free relay, U.S. won, anchored by an ace 53.xx from Jenny Thompson (U.S.). He! he! he! :D ho! ho! ho! I post this, ahead of www.swiminfo.com and www.swimnews.com who are sandbagging...
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Again, I don't deal with 'greatness' in my posts. I spelled three times that 'greatness' is based on a list of criteria, list that I don't do. I deal with the criteria of winning like a non-'flash-in-the-pan' in the Olympics, as I define it by who in swimming wins in one Olympics and confirms that win by winning again in other Olympics. I call this non-'flash-in-the-pan' winning in different Olympics, longevity in being number one in a swimming event. Salnikov qualifies as a non-'flash-in-the-pan' by this definition: .) Salnikov won in 1980; .) Salnikov couldn't win in 1984 when he was peaking, because Russia boycotted the Olympics; .) at the next Olympics available to him, in 1988, Salnikov won again.
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Again, I don't deal with 'greatness' in my posts. I spelled three times that 'greatness' is based on a list of criteria, list that I don't do. I deal with the criteria of winning like a non-'flash-in-the-pan' in the Olympics, as I define it by who in swimming wins in one Olympics and confirms that win by winning again in other Olympics. I call this non-'flash-in-the-pan' winning in different Olympics, longevity in being number one in a swimming event. Salnikov qualifies as a non-'flash-in-the-pan' by this definition: .) Salnikov won in 1980; .) Salnikov couldn't win in 1984 when he was peaking, because Russia boycotted the Olympics; .) at the next Olympics available to him, in 1988, Salnikov won again.
Children
No Data