The new Master's coach philosophy is to do lower yardage and more IM. Lots of kicks (strengthen the core), lots of drills, and lots of toys (snorkel, skull finger paddles, regular paddles, zoomers, regular fins, *** stoke fins, finis tempo trainer, light weight kick board...) (disclaimer...I have not bought any of this stuff, just have the normal toys). I am in my 60's, have swum forever, many years in masters, raised age-group kids through college swimming, and am very confused.
I am used to 10 x 100 or 5 x 200's or couple 500's, IM once in a while, option to swim IM or free, kicks as a set in a workout, you know what I'm talkin' bout.
Now I am exhausted doing 90 minutes of kicks and sprints and only going 2000 yards. Flipping at the end of every set, using weight balls in the water, doing 6 x 100 *** stroke kick no hands, doing tandem training, example: swimming arm in arm with the other 60 year old doing fly kicks then holding his legs while I kick and he strokes, then vise versa. Now it is not always exhausting, but it seems always to be frustrating.
Working hard is not the problem, but working hard doing fly kicks in 50 meter pools is frustrating. And my distance flog is suffering. Not just 4 x 50 fly kicks, but 10 x 50 fly kicks.
It has been 4 months with new coach. Others say that they workouts are making them stronger for races and allowing them to be tougher. I worry about hurting my back, my shoulders, and not getting in my yardage.
Fitness swimming should be challenging and fun; I am a wimp? Should I give it more time? I like my team!
As an actual Masters coach and not someone marketing a product, change is good for Masters swimmers.
Coaches or businesses are ultimately responsible for the safety and satisfaction of their swimmers and of preserving harmony within the team. As I mentioned in my previous posts, we need to go back to the original message in this thread. This is someone who did not voice their concerns as objection to change for its own sake, but rather to a type of change that made him feel uncomfortable and at risk for injury, being asked to perform sets that were not at his level. Showering any individual, whether an age-grouper or a Masters swimmer, with abusive comments ("I would say you are a wimp and need to suck it up") in response to their discomfort is beyond irresponsible.
I also take issue with aztimm and his years-long diatribe about how few USMS members compete. That is a pure fallacy. While only 1/3 may do swim meets a significantly higher percentage may do swim meet, running races, triathlons, etc. On the huge team I am a member of I'd say probably less than 10% are total non-competitors, in anything.
I'll refer you to the USMS website: "About 25 percent of our nearly 60,000 members enter pool or open water competitions. The greater percentage of USMS members does not compete."
There is no doubt that change is good and should absolutely be encouraged. No one disputes that. But any change needs to be gradual, and respectful to the swimmers. What is considered to be "good change" depends upon the individual and in Masters swimming, participants deserve to have the independence to make decisions on their own. They should not be ridiculed or dismissed for their choices.
As an actual Masters coach and not someone marketing a product, change is good for Masters swimmers.
Coaches or businesses are ultimately responsible for the safety and satisfaction of their swimmers and of preserving harmony within the team. As I mentioned in my previous posts, we need to go back to the original message in this thread. This is someone who did not voice their concerns as objection to change for its own sake, but rather to a type of change that made him feel uncomfortable and at risk for injury, being asked to perform sets that were not at his level. Showering any individual, whether an age-grouper or a Masters swimmer, with abusive comments ("I would say you are a wimp and need to suck it up") in response to their discomfort is beyond irresponsible.
I also take issue with aztimm and his years-long diatribe about how few USMS members compete. That is a pure fallacy. While only 1/3 may do swim meets a significantly higher percentage may do swim meet, running races, triathlons, etc. On the huge team I am a member of I'd say probably less than 10% are total non-competitors, in anything.
I'll refer you to the USMS website: "About 25 percent of our nearly 60,000 members enter pool or open water competitions. The greater percentage of USMS members does not compete."
There is no doubt that change is good and should absolutely be encouraged. No one disputes that. But any change needs to be gradual, and respectful to the swimmers. What is considered to be "good change" depends upon the individual and in Masters swimming, participants deserve to have the independence to make decisions on their own. They should not be ridiculed or dismissed for their choices.
